Volume 3, No. 6 June 2024 (1273-1283)
p-ISSN 2980-4868 |
e-ISSN 2980-4841
https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp
Prevalence
of Listeria spp. in Fresh Shrimp from Local Markets and Its Susceptibility to Antibiotics
Retnani Rahmiati1*, Winiati P Rahayu2,
Sri Budiarti3, Harsi D Kusumaningrum4
1,2,3,4IPB
University, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
Email: retnani.rahmiati@unitomo.ac.id
ABSTRACT
This
study aimed to determine the prevalence of Listeria spp. in fresh shrimp in
Bogor, Indonesia, and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of
isolated Listeria spp. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed. A
total of 25 samples of fresh shrimp were obtained from randomly selected
traditional markets (n = 18) and modern markets (n = 7). The results revealed
that 14 samples (56.0%) were positive for Listeria spp. Among them, 11 (78.6%)
and 3 (21.4%) were selected from traditional markets and modern markets, respectively.
Thirty-six isolates, which upon biochemical characterization included 1 (2.8%)
Listeria innocua, 26 (72.2%) Listeria grayi, 1 (2.8%) Listeria welshimeri, and
8 (22.2%) Listeria-like strains, were identified. The most common isolates were
L. grayi, while the least common were L. innocua and L. welshimeri. The disk
diffusion assay determined the susceptibility of the 36 strains to 10
commercial antibiotics. In general, 100% of the 36 isolated Listeria spp. were
resistant to amoxicillin and nebacetin, and almost 100% were susceptible to
chloramphenicol. However, antibiotic multiple resistance (AMR) was observed,
with all Listeria strains resistant to more than two antibiotics. No isolate
was resistant to only one antibiotic. The present study provides the first
baseline data on the prevalence of Listeria spp. in fresh shrimp in Indonesia
and the susceptibility of these isolates to antibiotics.
Keywords: Antibiotic, Fresh Shrimps, Listeria Spp., Prevalence,
Susceptibility.
INTRODUCTION
Listeria sp. is a
bacteria having commonly contaminates a variety of food
While in the United States of America, the mortality rate
caused by listeriosis is expected to be 16%
Some countries have a “zero–tolerance” policy for Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat
seafood from national and foreign producers. The fish industry in Indonesia
supplies both local consumption and export markets. The majority of Indonesian fishery products are exported
to several countries such as the United States, Europe, Japan, and some other
countries. Indonesian exports of fishery
products had refused by the USFDA because contaminated with Listeria in 2012 and 2013 about 0.6% and
11.8%, respectively
Fishery products especially fresh shrimp local
consumption marketed in Indonesia are typically sold at two types of markets
i.e. modern markets and traditional markets. The modern markets, which are in-door
markets, often display fresh products under refrigeration. In contrast,
traditional markets usually display in the open air at ambient temperatures. Since there is not much information regarding Listeria
species in fresh shrimp in Indonesia, this study was carried out to
determine the prevalence of Listeria spp. in fresh
shrimp and susceptibility to
antibiotics of Listeria strains
isolated from fresh shrimp collected from modern markets and traditional
markets in Bogor, Indonesia.
The
study aims to determine the prevalence of Listeria species in fresh shrimp
marketed in Indonesia, specifically focusing on Bogor. It seeks to compare the
prevalence of Listeria spp. in fresh shrimp sold in modern markets, which
typically display products under refrigeration, versus traditional markets,
where products are displayed at ambient temperatures. Additionally, the study
aims to assess the antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria strains isolated from
fresh shrimp collected from both types of markets in Bogor, Indonesia.
RESEARCH METHODS
This
research employed a quantitative descriptive approach to evaluate the presence
of Listeria bacteria in shrimp from traditional markets (n = 18) and modern
markets (n = 7) in Bogor, Indonesia. Shrimp samples were randomly collected,
placed in sterile bags, and transported to the laboratory in a cool box with
ice to maintain a temperature of 4°C until analysis. The USDA method described
by Hitchins and Jinneman
The
techniques recommended by Hitchins and Jinneman (2003) were followed to confirm
and identify Listeria species. Colonies suspected to be Listeria on Palcam agar
exhibited bluish-gray colonies and produced a black zone of esculin hydrolysis.
These putative Listeria colonies were characterized using Gram staining,
motility, and catalase tests, hemolysis characteristics on blood agar, and
carbohydrate utilization. Listeria spp. were identified as Gram-positive
bacilli or coccobacilli,
catalase-positive, and showing motility at 28°C as umbrella-like growth on SIM
agar (Oxoid). Hemolytic-positive colonies were identified as Listeria
monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, and L. seeligeri, while L. innocua, L. grayi, and
L. welshimeri were hemolytic negative. For the carbohydrate utilization test,
isolated colonies from TSAYE were transferred into test tubes containing 5 mL
of Purple Carbohydrate Base (Oxoid) with 0.5% D-glucose, maltose, mannitol,
xylose, and rhamnose, and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. Positive reactions were
indicated by a yellow color (acid fermentation), mostly occurring within 24 to
48 hours.
Antibiotic
susceptibility patterns of all confirmed Listeria isolates were determined
using the standard disc method. The Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute
method
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Out of the
25 samples of fresh shrimp, 56.0 % (14/25) were positive and 44.0 % (11/25)
were negative for Listeria species
(Table 1). When comparing samples taken from traditional markets and modern
markets, 78.6 % of positive samples for Listeria
(11/14) originated from traditional markets, and 21.4 % (3/14) samples from
modern markets. Positive samples based on the kind of
market shown are 61.1 and 42.9 % for the traditional market and modern market, respectively. Thirty-six
bacterial strains isolated from 14 of 25 (56.0 %) fresh shrimp samples were
identified, which, upon biochemical characterization, as members of the genus Listeria, as shown in Table 2. Fresh
shrimp samples examined harbored 4 Listeria
species: a single isolate of L. innocua (2.8%), 26 isolates of L. grayi (72.2 %), a single isolate of L. welshimeri (2.8
%), and 8 isolates of Listeria-like
strain (22.2%). The most common isolates were L. grayi while the least isolates were L. innocua and
L. welshimeri.
However, L. monocytogenes was not
found in all of the fresh shrimp samples was observed.
Table 3 shows the number of isolates for each category (with percentage) of
antibiotics tested. In General, one hundred percent of 36 isolated Listeria spp. were resistant to amoxicillin and nebacetin. More
than 80% were resistant to ampicillin, erythromycin, and kanamicin precisely is
86.1, 91.7, and 83.3%, respectively. All strains of Listeria spp. none resistant to
chloramphenicol but otherwise, 94.4% are susceptible and 5.6% are intermediate.
However, antibiotic multiple resistance (AMR) was
observed, all of the Listeria strains
were resistant to more than two antibiotics. In addition, no isolate was seen as
resistant to only one antibiotic.
Table 1. Detection
of Listeria spp. in the samples of
fresh shrimps
Detection
of Listeria |
No. of
samples (% of samples) |
||||||||
Based
on total samples |
Based
on positive samples |
Based
on kind of market |
|||||||
TM |
MM |
Total |
TM |
MM |
Total |
TM |
MM |
Total |
|
Positive |
11
(44/0) |
3
(12.0) |
14
(56.0) |
11
(78.6) |
3
(21.4) |
14
(100.0) |
11
(61.1) |
3
(42.9) |
- |
Negative |
7
(28.0) |
4
(16.0) |
11
(44.0) |
- |
- |
- |
7
(38.9) |
4
(57.1) |
- |
No. of
samples |
18
(72.0) |
7
(28.0) |
25
(100.0) |
11
(78.6) |
3
(21.4) |
14
(100.0) |
18
(100.0) |
7
(100.0) |
- |
TM = Traditional market; MM = Modern
market
Table 2. Prevalence of Listeria
spp. in the samples of fresh shrimps
Sample nomor |
Origin |
Listeia |
No. of isolates (% of samples contaminated) |
|||
L. innocua |
L. grayi |
L. welshimeri |
Listeria-like strain |
|||
1 |
TM |
+ |
1 (2.8) |
1 (2.8) |
- |
- |
2 |
TM |
+ |
- |
1 (2.8) |
- |
1 (2.8) |
3 |
TM |
+ |
- |
3 (8.3) |
- |
- |
4 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
TM |
+ |
- |
2 (5.6) |
- |
- |
6 |
TM |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
1 (2.8) |
7 |
MM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
8 |
MM |
+ |
- |
5 (13.9) |
- |
- |
9 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
10 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
11 |
TM |
+ |
- |
1 (2.8) |
- |
- |
12 |
TM |
+ |
- |
4 (11.11) |
- |
- |
13 |
TM |
+ |
- |
2 (5.6) |
1 (2.8) |
1 (2.8) |
14 |
TM |
+ |
- |
4 (11.11) |
- |
1 (2.8) |
15 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
16 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
17 |
TM |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
1 (2.8) |
18 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
19 |
MM |
+ |
- |
2 (5.6) |
- |
2 (5.6) |
20 |
MM |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
1 (2.8) |
21 |
MM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
22 |
MM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
23 |
MM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
24 |
TM |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
TM |
+ |
- |
1 (2.8) |
- |
- |
|
Total |
|
1 (2.8) |
26 (72.2) |
1 (2.8) |
8 (22.2) |
TM = Traditional market; MM = Modern
market; + = Positive; - =
Negative
Table 3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles of Listeria spp. Isolated from Samples of Fresh Shrimp
Anti-biotics |
L.
innocua (n = 1) |
L.
welshimeri (n = 1) |
L. grayi (n = 26) |
Listeria-like strain (n = 8) |
Total (n=36) No. of isolates (% of samples) |
||||||||||
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
S |
I |
R |
|
Amp |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
5 (13.9) |
0 (00.0 ) |
31 (86.1) |
Amx |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 (00.0) |
0 (00.0) |
36 (100.0) |
Chlp |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
34 (94.4) |
2 (05.6) |
0 (00.0) |
Ern |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 (00.0) |
3 (08.3) |
33 (91.7) |
Tetra |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
6 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
26 (72.2) |
8 (22.2) |
2 (05.6) |
Tri-Sm |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
17 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
8 (22.2) |
24 (66.7) |
4 (11.1) |
Knm |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
0 (00.0) |
6 (16.7) |
30 (83.3) |
Gtm |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
15 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
13 (36.11) |
21 (58.3) |
2 (05.6) |
Nbc |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 (00.0) |
0 (00.0) |
36 (100.0) |
Cont |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
7 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
4 (11.1) |
23 (63.9) |
9 (25.0) |
Amp =
Ampicillin; Amx= Amoxicillin; Chlp = Chloramphenicol; Ern = Erythromycin; Tetra
= Tetracycline; Tri-Sm = Trimethooprim-Sulfamethoxazole; Knm = Kanamycin; Gtm = Gentamicin; Nbc = Nebacetin/neomicin, Cont =
Contrimozazole; S:
Susceptible; I: Intermmediate; R: Resistan.
Almost all L.
grayi isolates have the same pattern of susceptibility to antibiotics,
except for ampicillin, trimethooprim-sulfamethoxazole,
gentamicin, and cotrimoxazole some isolates showed a susceptible response but
otherwise are resistant. While Listeria-like
strain isolates showed, just only one isolate had a contrast response for
ampicillin and trimethooprim-sulfamethoxazole.
Likewise, all of the isolates from the same sample have the same pattern of susceptibility to antibiotics,
but there is one exception. Two isolates from the same sample showed different
responses for ampicillin, one showed a susceptible effect and the other one
showed a resistant effect.
Discussion
The general
occurrence of Listeria spp. in fresh
shrimp is limited reported in many countries. This study has shown that
contamination of Listeria spp. Is as
much as 56.0% higher than the finding of the previous research in Indonesia by Murtiningsih and Sunarya
Percentage
the prevalence of Listeria spp. Detected
in traditional markets is higher than in modern markets. Our observation was
that the markets where samples were purchased is very crowded, and fresh shrimp
were sold in the open air without ice, products in direct contact with the
seller’s hands, and the floor around it was very dirty. Otherwise, conditions
in the modern markets are cleaner than the traditional markets, and fresh
shrimp are sold with ice in a cold room. Thus, we are tempted to speculate about
the high rates of Listeria spp. Because
of bad handling cross-contamination occurs.
The present
results of this study suggest that fresh shrimp is potentially a source of Listeria contamination and infection. The microorganism,
because of its ubiquity in nature, may be introduced into food-processing
environments and ultimately may result in the contamination of food
products. Fish products and other seafood, including shrimp, have a
risk to a contaminated with Listeria,
which may be from water sources that they are cultivated. These indigene
bacteria can also contaminate products during the processing step, either by
cross-contamination in industry or because these bacteria are naturally present
in many food industrial environments or in human skin
Positive samples were examined harbored 4
Listeria species that are L.
innocua, L. grayi, L. welsimeri, and a Listeria-like
strain dominated by L. grayi. Different to the invention of Murtiningsih and Sunarya
However, The results of pattern antibiotic
susceptibility are similar to the findings by
Issa et al.
We observed all of the Listeria strains are antibiotic
multiple resistance (AMR). Antibiotic
multiple resistance incidents on Listeria
spp. were also reported by Walsh et al.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we have demonstrated in this study that
the fresh shrimps we collected were positive for Listeria spp. contamination both to traditional markets and modern
markets. Species found in samples of
fresh shrimp are L. innocua, L. grayi, L. welshimeri, and Listeria-like strains, which are dominated by L. grayi. Of all the samples, L.
monocutogenes. The result of the susceptibility of antibiotics
demonstrated that isolated Listeria
spp. from fresh shrimp samples are
resistant to many antibiotics, there are ampicillin,
amoxicillin, erythromycin, kanamycin, and nebacetin. Isolated Listeria spp. were susceptible to
chloramphenicol, streptomycin, and tetracycline. All of Listeria
spp. are AMR, which have more than 3 resistant to antibiotics. The present
study provides the first baseline data on the prevalence of Listeria spp. in fresh shrimp in
Indonesia and the susceptibility of these isolates to antibiotics. The data may be useful for all people concerned with the
antibiotic susceptibility of Listeria
spp.
REFERENCES
Afhami, S., Borumand, M. A.,
Bazzaz, N. E., Saffar, H., Hadadi,
A., Nezhad, M. J., & Tirabadi, N. M. (2020).
Antimicrobial resistance pattern of Acinetobacter; a multicenter study,
comparing European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)
and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); evaluation of
susceptibility testing methods for polymyxin. Immunopathologia
Persa, 7(1), e04–e04.
Aguilera, M., Martínez, S., Tello, M., Gallardo,
M. J., & García, V. (2022). Use of cocktail of bacteriophage for
Salmonella typhimurium control in chicken meat. Foods, 11(8),
1164.
Allen, K. J., Wałecka-Zacharska,
E., Chen, J. C., Katarzyna, K.-P., Devlieghere, F.,
Van Meervenne, E., Osek,
J., Wieczorek, K., & Bania, J. (2016). Listeria
monocytogenes–An examination of food chain factors potentially contributing to
antimicrobial resistance. Food Microbiology, 54, 178–189.
Chen, B., Pyla, R.,
Kim, T., Silva, J. L., & Jung, Y. (2010). Antibiotic resistance in
Listeria species isolated from catfish fillets and processing environment. Letters
in Applied Microbiology, 50(6), 626–632.
Costley Jessie, B. (2019). Prevalence and
Control of Salmonella spp. and Sanitary Indicator Microorganisms in Wild
Caught and Farm Raised Catfish (Ictalurus Punctatus).
Goh Ee, V., Nor-Khaizura,
M. A. R., & Nor Ainy, M. (2020). Antimicrobial-resistant
Salmonella spp. isolated from retail farmed shrimp in Kuala Lumpur.
Graves, L. M., Helsel,
L. O., Steigerwalt, A. G., Morey, R. E., Daneshvar, M. I., Roof, S. E., Orsi,
R. H., Fortes, E. D., Milillo, S. R., & Den
Bakker, H. C. (2010). Listeria marthii sp. nov., isolated from the natural environment, Finger Lakes
National Forest. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary
Microbiology, 60(6), 1280–1288.
Guillet, C., Join-Lambert, O., Le Monnier, A., Leclercq, A., Mechaï, F.,
Mamzer-Bruneel, M.-F., Bielecka,
M. K., Scortti, M., Disson,
O., & Berche, P. (2010). Human listeriosis
caused by Listeria ivanovii. Emerging Infectious
Diseases, 16(1), 136.
Hagens, S., & Loessner,
M. J. (2007). Application of bacteriophages for detection and control of
foodborne pathogens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 76,
513–519.
Hagens, S., & Loessner,
M. J. (2010). Bacteriophage for biocontrol of foodborne pathogens:
calculations and considerations. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 11(1),
58–68.
Hagens, S., & Offerhaus,
M. L. (2008). Bacteriophages-new weapons for food safety.
Hitchins, A. D. (2003). Detection and enumeration of
Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 10.
Issa, Z. M., Mustakim, M., Mohamed, S. A. S.,
Muda, N. M., Yen, L. H., & Radu, S. (2011). Antibiogram Profiles of
Listeria monocytogenes isolated from foods. 2011 2nd International
Conference on Biotechnology and Food Science IPCBEE, 7.
Ivanek, R., Gröhn, Y. T.,
& Wiedmann, M. (2006). Listeria monocytogenes in
multiple habitats and host populations: review of available data for
mathematical modeling. Foodbourne
Pathogens & Disease, 3(4), 319–336.
Jamali, H., Paydar,
M., Ismail, S., Looi, C. Y., Wong, W. F., Radmehr, B., & Abedini, A.
(2015). Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulotyping of Listeria
species and Listeria monocytogenes isolated from open-air fish markets. BMC
Microbiology, 15, 1–7.
Jessie, B. C. (2019). Prevalence and control
of Salmonella spp. and sanitary indicator microorganisms in wild caught and
farm raised catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).
Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College.
Kazi, M., & Annapure,
U. S. (2016). Bacteriophage biocontrol of foodborne pathogens. Journal of
Food Science and Technology, 53(3), 1355–1362.
Leclercq, A., Clermont, D., Bizet, C., Grimont, P. A. D., Le Fleche-Mateos,
A., Roche, S. M., Buchrieser, C., Cadet-Daniel, V.,
Le Monnier, A., & Lecuit, M. (2010). Listeria rocourtiae sp. nov. International
Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 60(9),
2210–2214.
Madden, R. H., Hutchison, M., Jordan, K., Pennone, V., Gundogdu, O., &
Corcionivoschi, N. (2018). Prevalence and
persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in premises and products of small food
business operators in Northern Ireland. Food Control, 87, 70–78.
Perrin, M., Bemer, M.,
& Delamare, C. (2003). Fatal case of Listeria innocua
bacteremia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 41(11), 5308–5309.
Pilet, M.-F., & Leroi, F. (2011). Applications of
protective cultures, bacteriocins and bacteriophages in fresh seafood and
seafood products. In Protective cultures, antimicrobial metabolites and
bacteriophages for food and beverage biopreservation
(pp. 324–347). Elsevier.
Rezai, R., Ahmadi, E., & Salimi,
B. (2018). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Listeria species
isolated from farmed and on-sale rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in
Western Iran. Journal of Food Protection, 81(6), 886–891.
Rokibul, M. H., Mrityunjoy,
A., Eshita, D., Kamal, K. D., Tasnia, A., Muhammad,
A. A., Kazi, K. F., & Rashed, N. (2013). Microbiological study of sea fish
samples collected from local markets in Dhaka city. International Food
Research Journal, 20(3), 1491.
Shen, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Cripe, J., Conway, W., Meng, J., Hall, G., & Bhagwat,
A. A. (2006). Isolation and characterization of Listeria monocytogenes
isolates from ready-to-eat foods in Florida. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 72(7), 5073–5076.
Sillankorva, S. M., Oliveira, H., & Azeredo,
J. (2012). Bacteriophages and their role in food safety. International
Journal of Microbiology, 2012(1), 863945.
Snapir, Y. M., Vaisbein, E.,
& Nassar, F. (2006). Low virulence but potentially fatal outcome—Listeria ivanovii. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 17(4),
286–287.
Sumner, J., McLeod, C., & Ross, T. (2014).
Assuring Safety of Seafood—Risk Assessment. Seafood Processing: Technology,
Quality and Safety, 453–478.
Sweezey, C., Chen, D., & Heacock,
H. (2019). Prevelance of Listeria in produce:
comparing the total number of food recalls from the result of Listeria
monocytogenes, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli in the last ten years using three year intervals. BCIT Environmental Public Health
Journal.
Todar, K. (2009). The Microbial World Lectures in
Microbiology. Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Troxler, R., Von Graevenitz,
A., Funke, G., Wiedemann, B., & Stock, I. (2000). Natural antibiotic
susceptibility of Listeria species: L. grayi, L. innocua, L. ivanovii, L.
monocytogenes, L. seeligeri and L. welshimeri strains. Clinical Microbiology and Infection,
6(10), 525–535.
Walsh, D., Duffy, G., Sheridan, J. J., Blair, I.
S., & McDowell, D. A. (2001). Antibiotic resistance among Listeria,
including Listeria monocytogenes, in retail foods. Journal of Applied
Microbiology, 90(4), 517–522.
Wang, F., Jiang, L., Yang, Q., Han, F., Chen,
S., Pu, S., Vance, A., & Ge, B. (2011). Prevalence and antimicrobial
susceptibility of major foodborne pathogens in imported seafood. Journal of
Food Protection, 74(9), 1451–1461.
Wen, X., Yang, Z., Dong, H., Fan, X., &
Wang, Y. (2018). Barriers to sustainable food trade: China’s exports food
rejected by the US Food and Drug Administration 2011–2017. Sustainability,
10(6), 1712.
Copyright holder: Retnani Rahmiati, Winiati P
Rahayu, Sri Budiarti, Harsi D Kusumaningrum (2024) |
First publication right: Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
(AJESH) |
This article is licensed under: |