Volume 3, No. 10
October 2024 - (2410-2418)![]()
p-ISSN 2980-4868 | e-ISSN 2980-4841
https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp
Democracy and Human Rights as Pillars of
National Resilience:
A Theoretical and Empirical Review
Doni Romdoni1, Arthur Josias Simon
Runturambi3
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Emails: doniromdoni14imi@gmail.com1, simonrbi@yahoo.com2
ABSTRACT
National resilience is a strategic concept that reflects the ability of a
country to maintain its survival in the face of various threats, both domestic
and foreign. Among the various pillars that underpin national resilience,
democracy and human rights (HAM) play an important role. This study aims to
determine and analyze the relationship between democracy, human rights, and
national resilience from the point of view of theory and empirical evidence.
This research uses a qualitative method with a literature study approach as a
data collection technique. After the data is collected, the analysis process is
carried out by sorting out relevant information, then presenting the data
systematically to draw conclusions. The results show that democracy has a major
role in providing legitimacy to the government, by creating a system where
people can participate in decision-making. On the other hand, human rights
become the main foundation of democracy, ensuring the protection of people's
basic rights, which in turn creates conditions conducive to social growth and
development. Some of the theories underlying the relationship between
democracy, human rights and national security include social contract theory,
liberal democracy theory and social justice theory. Empirically, several
studies have shown a positive relationship between the implementation of
democracy and human rights and national resilience. This research concludes
that democracy and human rights contribute to national resilience by
strengthening government legitimacy and creating an enabling environment for
social and political stability.
Keywords: Democracy, Human
Rights, Pillars of National Resilience.
INTRODUCTION
Entering an increasingly
dynamic era of globalization, national resilience has become a central issue
for every country. Globalization is defined as a phase of change that affects
societies around the world, where countries, regions, and communities are interconnected
in various fields of life. The hallmark of globalization is the blurring of
geographical boundaries, which has led to a wider and faster exchange of
information (Gunawijaya & Untara,
2023). However, behind the benefits of this global
connectivity, the ease of information dissemination also opens up opportunities
for conflict that can impact a country's national resilience.
A country that does not have
strong national resilience will be at risk of facing various threats and
challenges, both from within and outside the country. In fact, in the
worst-case scenario, the inability to maintain national resilience can cause a
country to collapse. National resilience itself is defined as a condition in
which a nation has the ability to face various threats, challenges, obstacles,
and disturbances that can disrupt its national stability (Handayani et al., 2023). More than just the military aspect, national resilience
includes various other aspects such as politics, economy, social, culture, and
defense and security.
The importance of
maintaining national resilience is something that needs to be prioritized for
the sustainability of a country (Zulkarnain &
Runturambi, 2022). Among the various pillars that support national
resilience, democracy and human rights (HAM) have a role in efforts to realize
the stability and welfare of the nation. Democracy, as a system of government
that gives power to the people, either directly or through their
representatives, is seen as one of the most effective systems in creating
political stability and prosperity for the country. This system encourages
active participation of citizens in the decision-making process, thus
strengthening the legitimacy of the government and creating social stability
(Al, 2020).
In addition to democracy,
human rights also have a role in maintaining national resilience. Human rights
are a set of rights inherent in every individual from birth, and their
existence is very important to create a dignified and just life. The enforcement
of human rights provides certainty that basic human rights are respected and
protected, thus creating the foundation for a just and harmonious society. When
human rights are guaranteed, every citizen can live with dignity, consequently
strengthening social cohesion and national resilience (Pesurnay & Pesurnay,
2021).
Previous research by (Hamdani & Fauzia,
2021) highlighted the concepts of democracy and human rights
as universal ideas that developed from the history of human civilization.
Democracy and human rights, in their historical development, are closely
related to the concept of the rule of law. In this case, Indonesia, as a state
of law, places law in a hierarchy culminating in the constitution. This
constitution clearly states the importance of human rights protection, as
stated in Article 28I paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution, which stipulates
that human rights must be protected by the state.
Meanwhile, research by (Alfian, 2017) focuses on the role of the state in implementing the
principles of democracy and human rights in Indonesia. The results show that
the protection of human rights requires the involvement of the state to
guarantee and protect the basic rights of the people. The state must not only
passively protect human rights, but also play an active role in ensuring that
these rights are fulfilled. Human rights violations are not only committed by
the state, but also by non-state actors, including individuals and companies.
Therefore, the state's responsibility to preserve and protect human rights
becomes very important, especially in the face of issues such as crimes against
humanity, genocide, war crimes, poverty, and underdevelopment.
The novelty of this research
lies in the analysis conducted to explore the relationship between democracy
and human rights in national resilience, both from a theoretical and empirical
perspective. The findings of this research can provide valuable advice to the
government and stakeholders in formulating relevant policies related to
democracy, human rights, and national resilience. In addition, this research
also aims to raise public awareness regarding the significance of democracy and
human rights as important pillars for national resilience. Through focusing on
the relationship between these three elements, this research seeks to provide a
deeper understanding of how democracy and human rights support each other in
strengthening national resilience. Therefore, this research has the main
objective of reviewing the relationship between democracy, human rights, and
national resilience based on theoretical and empirical reviews.
RESEARCH METHOD
This research uses a qualitative approach as a research method. Qualitative
method is an approach that is carried out in a certain setting that exists in
real life (natural) with the aim of investigating and understanding the
phenomena that occur. The main purpose of qualitative research is to gain a
deep understanding of the condition of a problem by describing a portrait of
the situation in detail and in detail. Qualitative research focuses on
describing what happens in the field naturally and without manipulation,
according to what it is (Fadli, 2021). The data collection technique in this study
was carried out through literature studies, namely by collecting information
from previous studies and relevant sources that are already available. The data
collected can be in the form of research results, documents, scientific
articles, and other information that can support the analysis in this study.
After the data is collected, it is analyzed in several stages. The first stage
is data reduction, which is the process of sorting and filtering information that
is relevant to the research objectives. Furthermore, the data that has been
filtered is presented systematically to make it easier to understand the
relationship between variables or phenomena being studied. The final step is to
draw conclusions based on the results of the analysis and the data that has
been presented, which then provides the final picture of this research.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION
National
resilience is a synergistic condition that reflects the ability of a nation to
face internal and external challenges that have the potential to disrupt
national stability and identity. (Mardhani et al.,
2020) describe national resilience as a concept that
becomes a strategic foundation in dealing with various national issues through
the approach of aspects of national life. This concept continues to be fostered
by developing national strength to achieve state goals. In addition, the
concept of national resilience is often understood as a dynamic condition of a
nation, which reflects its ability to deal with various forms of threats that
can come from within and outside the country. These threats can be in the form
of disturbances to national identity, territorial integrity, and the survival
of the nation itself (Handayani et al.,
2023). this definition, it can be seen that national
resilience is very important for a country because it shows that the nation is
able to maintain its existence and continue to develop in the midst of
increasingly complicated global challenges.
National
resilience has a very important role in achieving national goals and ideals and
realizing the success of a country's development. This resilience is a
fundamental prerequisite for the survival and progress of a nation.
Traditionally, national resilience reflects the dynamic strength of a country,
which includes the ability, determination, and strength of the country to face
various threats, challenges, obstacles, and problems. These threats can come
from within and outside the country, either directly or indirectly, which can
threaten the integrity, identity, and welfare of the nation and state (Mahmudah & Jaya,
2024).
In
the midst of an increasingly transformed world, threats to national resilience
are not only limited to military attacks or physical threats, but also include
broader issues such as cyber security, terrorism, climate change, and the
global economic crisis. All of these factors require national readiness and
strength that can respond quickly and effectively, to protect the integrity of
the nation and ensure stability and prosperity for all citizens.
In
Indonesia, there is currently a tendency for a distorted understanding of
pluralism that is not in line with the nation's identity. This has led to
conflicts and tensions in a plural society. These conflicts arise due to
differences in views between communities, as well as between communities and
the state, especially regarding democracy. In addition, the tendency for
disintegration is triggered by complex factors such as injustice in the
economic, political, social, religious, cultural and legal fields.
Long-standing primordial tensions without resolution, government autocracy, and
the decline of exemplary political, religious, and community leaders have all
contributed to exacerbating conflicts that occur in society (Hebatullah, 2021).
To
strengthen national resilience, an approach through democracy and human rights
(HAM) can be a strong foundation. Democracy is a system of government in which
supreme power rests with the people, giving people the right to participate in
decision-making through elections. Democracy also guarantees freedom of
expression, organization and religion (Trisno et al., 2024). On the other hand, human rights include the basic
rights inherent in every individual from birth, regardless of race, color, sex,
language, religion, political opinion, social origin, or other status (Siregar et al.,
2023). These two principles, if implemented properly, can
be the foundation for the creation of harmony and justice in the midst of
national diversity.
According
to Rosana (2016), the issue of democracy is always closely related to human
rights because the struggle to uphold democracy is actually an effort to
guarantee and protect the basic rights of every individual. Democracy as a
political system prioritizes respect for these rights, including not only civil
and political rights, but also economic, social and cultural rights. Along with
its development, democracy is increasingly recognized as an instrument to help
every citizen have fair access to economic welfare, education, and other social
opportunities. A democratic state will be better able to guarantee the full
implementation of human rights. Conversely, democracy will not work well if the
basic rights of the people are not guaranteed. This connection shows that human
rights and democracy are mutually reinforcing and serve as the main pillars in
creating a just and equitable society.
Democracy
and human rights play an important role as pillars of national security,
providing the foundation for political, social and legal stability in a
country. One of the main roles of democracy is to provide legitimacy to the
government. Through free and fair elections, democracy facilitates people to
directly elect leaders, thereby strengthening the relationship between the
government and society. This reduces the potential for political conflict and
increases stability, as the government has a legitimate mandate from the people
(Trisno et al., 2024). In addition, democracy encourages people's active
participation in the country's development. Being directly involved in the
decision-making process, people feel responsible for the sustainability of the
country, thus strengthening their sense of belonging to the nation. This
participation also builds stronger national solidarity.
On
the other hand, human rights are a key cornerstone of democracy, where
upholding human rights creates a conducive environment for the growth and
development of society. According to (Ishak & Komnas,
2016), if law enforcement, especially in terms of human
rights, is done unfairly or inconsistently, then this can cause disappointment
and blur social solidarity. Injustice in law enforcement, especially when it
comes to gross human rights violations that are not resolved decisively, has
the potential to divide society and create different collective memories among
social groups. Conversely, when human rights are well-enforced, this will form
a positive collective memory that can strengthen social integration and
national unity, which in turn makes national resilience stronger.
Furthermore,
another role of democracy and human rights is to prevent conflict. By providing
safe and open channels for people to express their aspirations and resolve
problems peacefully, the system is able to manage potential conflicts before
they become a serious threat to national stability (Budijanto &
Rahmanto, 2021).
Countries
that are democratic and respect human rights tend to have higher welfare levels
because their governments are more responsive to the needs of the people.
Democracy helps people to actively participate in the decision-making process,
so that every policy and legislation implemented reflects the interests and
sense of justice of the community. The principle of popular sovereignty is at
the core of democracy, where every regulation made does not only serve the
interests of a handful of rulers, but must ensure justice for all people (Faza et al., 2023). Based on this, laws and regulations are not
applied unilaterally or used for the benefit of certain parties, but to create
balance and equal justice for everyone. It can be seen that a country that
upholds democracy and human rights will create a more inclusive and equitable
system, consequently contributing to the improvement of the overall welfare of
society.
Based
on these significant roles, democracy and human rights serve as key pillars in
maintaining national resilience, which can be viewed from both theoretical and
empirical perspectives. Some of the theories that can underlie this
relationship are, such as:
1.
Social
contract theory
Social contract theory explains that the state is
formed on the basis of an agreement between individuals who give up some of
their freedom in order to get protection from the state. This theory asserts
that the state is obliged to maintain a balance between state power and
individual freedom, and ensure the protection of human rights as part of the
social contract between the state and its citizens (Loewe et al., 2021). In this case, democracy and human rights are the
basic elements that regulate the relationship between individuals and the
state. Democracy facilitates people to elect leaders and determine the
direction of state policy, while human rights protect the freedom and rights of
individuals in society.
2.
Theory
of liberal democracy
Liberal democracy, also known as constitutional
democracy, is a political system that protects the rights of individuals from
government power through constitutional protections. A key feature of liberal
democracies is the frequent change of cabinets, which is due to the large
number of political parties in a country, although none has an absolute
majority. Liberal democracy emphasizes the importance of individual freedom and
the right to participate in government. Many modern countries adopt the liberal
democracy model because this system guarantees political freedom and human
rights, with a constitution that provides protection against potentially
oppressive government power (Arta, 2020).
3.
Social
justice theory
Social justice theory highlights the importance of
fairness in the distribution of resources and opportunities in society. In a
democracy, social justice is an important goal that must be achieved through
fair and equitable policies. Democracy and human rights are the main
instruments to realize social justice, where the state must ensure that every
individual has equal access to economic, social and cultural rights. In
addition, this theory covers human relationships with themselves, with fellow
humans, with the state, and with God. The implementation of democracy and human
rights aims to maintain a balance in these four aspects, in order to create a
just and prosperous society (Aditya, 2024).
Empirically,
several studies have shown a positive correlation between democracy, human
rights and national resilience (Budijanto &
Rahmanto, 2021; Landman, 2018; Ristovska & Pelivanova, 2018). Countries that are democratic and uphold human
rights tend to be more stable, prosperous, and have lower levels of conflict.
This is also supported by research conducted by Bagchi and Paul (2021) in
India, who found that a decline in human rights standards can lead to an
increase in violence and minimize the chances of conflict de-escalation, an
effect that proved statistically significant.
However,
while democracy and human rights are recognized as important pillars for
national resilience, their implementation in many countries still faces a
number of challenges. Corruption, radicalism, and economic and social
inequality are significant obstacles (Akbar et al., 2023). Corruption is not only an act of abuse of power,
but also has the potential to undermine the foundations of state development.
When corrupt practices are widespread, this will have an impact on reducing
public trust in the government as well as weakening the legitimacy of the
government itself. People who lose trust will find it difficult to participate
in the democratic process, creating political instability. As public
dissatisfaction with the government increases, the potential for protests and
social unrest increases, which can undermine national resilience.
On
the other hand, radicalism poses a real threat to national security. When
extreme ideologies flourish in society, the potential for conflict and violence
increases. Radicalism can disrupt security stability and also create social
tensions between different groups in society. The result is mutual suspicion
and hostility, undermining the social cohesion that is essential in maintaining
national security.
In
addition, persistent economic and social inequality is also a factor that
triggers conflict. When a group of people feels marginalized or denied equal
access to resources and opportunities, individuals may potentially feel the
need to take extreme measures to fight for their rights. These injustices can
cause friction between groups in society, worsening social conditions and
adding to the country's vulnerability to conflict.
Based on the persistence of these challenges, the
government needs to take effective measures to address them in an effort to
ensure that the pillars of democracy and human rights can function properly in
strengthening national resilience. These efforts must be done in an integrated
manner, involving community participation and realizing that all individuals
feel valued and get justice in the existing system. Only in this way can the
state create an environment conducive to sustainable stability and peace
CONCLUSION
The
conclusion of this study shows that democracy and human rights are important
pillars in supporting national resilience. Democracy plays an important role in
providing legitimacy to the government by encouraging public participation in
the decision-making process, thus giving the government legitimate powers. At
the same time, human rights are fundamental to democracy, as they protect the
basic rights of citizens, creating conditions that promote social development
and progress. Theories such as social contract theory, which emphasizes the
agreement between the government and the people to form a legitimate
government, liberal democracy theory, which emphasizes the importance of
individual freedom, and social justice theory, which underlines the importance
of equitable distribution of resources, all highlight the interdependence
between democracy, human rights and national security.
Empirical
evidence from this study suggests a positive relationship between democratic
practices, respect for human rights and national resilience. Both democracy and
human rights significantly contribute to national resilience by enhancing
government legitimacy, promoting social and political stability, and enabling
states to effectively withstand various threats while maintaining societal
continuity. In the future, this research can contribute to policy formulation
by offering insights into strengthening democratic institutions and ensuring
the protection of human rights as strategies to enhance national resilience.
Future research could also explore how emerging global challenges, such as
technological advancements and climate change, impact democratic processes and
human rights, providing valuable guidance for future governance and
resilience-building efforts.
REFERENCES
Aditya, F. (2024). Konsep Keadilan Sosial Dalam Pancasila: Implementasinya
Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia (JPPI),
1(4), 123–126.
Akbar, A., Sihabudin, M. Y., Firdaus, R. E., & Pahreji, R. (2023).
Perkembangan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Advances In Social Humanities Research,
1(5), 627–635.
Alfian, M. (2017). The Role Of The State In The Implementation Of
Democracy And Human Rights In Indonesia. Yustisia, 6(1), 199–223.
Arta, K. S. (2020). Sistem Pemerintahan Demokrasi Liberal Dan Tercapainya
Pemilihan Umum I Pada Tahun 1955 Di Indonesia. Jurnal Widya Citra, 1(2),
69–85.
Budijanto, O. W., & Rahmanto, T. Y. (2021). Pencegahan Paham
Radikalisme Melalui Optimalisasi Pendidikan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Jurnal
Ham, 12(1), 57.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika,
Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54.
Faza, Q. N., Fitriani, R. A. N., & Attallah, O. (2023). Perlindungan
Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia Sebagai Aktualisasi Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi. Innovative:
Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 2538–2550.
Gunawijaya, T., & Untara, I. M. G. S. (2023). Globalisasi Dan Ancamannya Bagi Ketahanan Nasional Dalam
Aspek Ideologi. Veda Jyotih: Jurnal Agama Dan Sains, 2(1), 119–128.
Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2021). Legal Discourse: The Spirit of
Democracy and Human Rights Post Simultaneous Regional Elections 2020 in the
Covid-19 Pandemic Era. Lex Scientia Law Review, 5(1), 97–118.
Handayani, W., Sulistyantoro, H., Darmawan, R., & Ratnawati, E. T. R.
(2023). Strengthening National Resilience through the Implementation of
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) in Higher Education. Nusantara
Science and Technology Proceedings, 110–116.
Hebatullah, H. (2021). Hak Asasi Manusia (Ham) Dan Demokrasi Di
Indonesia.
Ishak, O. S., & Komnas, H. A. M. (2016). Pancasila, Hak Asasi
Manusia dan Ketahanan Nasional. Komnas HAM.
Landman, T. (2018). Democracy and human rights: Concepts, measures, and
relationships. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 48–59.
Loewe, M., Zintl, T., & Houdret, A. (2021). The social contract as a
tool of analysis: Introduction to the special issue on “Framing the evolution
of new social contracts in Middle Eastern and North African countries.” World
Development, 145, 104982.
Mahmudah, L. S., & Jaya, A. I. A. (2024). Membangun Kebangsaan Yang
Kokoh: Urgensi Ketahanan Nasional Dan Peran Bela Negara. Jurnal Terapung:
Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 32–39.
Mardhani, D., Runturambi, A. J. S., & Hanita, M. (2020). Security And
Defense In National Resilience Studies To Realize A National Security System. Jurnal
Pertahanan Dan Bela Negara, 10(3), 267–286.
Pesurnay, A., & Pesurnay, A. J. (2021). Kontrak Sosial Menurut
Immanuel Kant: Kontekstualisasinya Dengan Penegakan HAM Di Indonesia.
Ristovska, M., & Pelivanova, N. (2018). Human Rights And Democracy
Vis-À-Vis National Security: Is There An Antagonism? International
Scientific Conference “Security, Political and Legal Challenges of the Modern
World” Conference Proceedings, 2, 36–42.
Siregar, D., Ginting, G. E. B., Nduru, H., Buulolo, S. W., Hulu, F. Y.,
Nduru, A., Zalukhu, I. J., Halawa, S., Putra, W. A., & Aritonang, J. G.
(2023). Law Enforcement of Human Rights (HAM) in Indonesia. Jurnal Smart
Hukum (JSH), 1(3), 389–395.
Trisno, B., Aprillia, O., Latifah, O., Safira, D., & Putri, T. A.
(2024). Konsep dan Urgensi Demokrasi yang Bersumber dari Pancasila. JISPENDIORA
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 3(2), 195–208.
Zulkarnain, I., & Runturambi, A. J. S. (2022). Sumber daya nasional
komponen cadangan dalam memperkuat ketahanan negara. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan
Konseling (JPDK), 4(6), 9937–9949.
|
Doni Romdoni, Arthur Josias Simon Runturambi (2024) |
|
First publication right: Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health (AJESH) |
|
This article is licensed under: |