Page 2548
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024 - (2548-2560)
p-ISSN 2980-4868 | e-ISSN 2980-4841
https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship
Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Chris Setio Wardoyo1*, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala2
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Emails: chris.setio@gmail.com1, adrianusmeliala@gmail.com2
ABSTRACT
The issue of loyalty and the potential of dual citizenship policies for the Indonesian diaspora, especially
the generation of students in the 1960s, is a major concern in the context of state and diaspora relations.
This research aims to explore the dynamics of transnational identity, the challenges of a single citizenship
policy, and the potential contribution of the diaspora to national development. Using a qualitative
approach through in-depth interviews and document analysis, this research explores the perspectives of
the Indonesian diaspora regarding the limitations of their citizenship status and the potential of dual
citizenship policy as an optimal solution. The results show that Indonesian diasporas often experience a
dilemma between the desire to contribute to the homeland and the limitations imposed by the single
citizenship status. A dual citizenship policy is seen as a potential measure to increase diaspora
participation in national development. In addition, the research identifies the importance of a national
strategy that includes comprehensive diaspora mapping, flexible engagement mechanisms, brain
circulation programs, and economic initiatives such as diaspora bonds. However, challenges in
implementing these policies include issues of dual loyalty and administrative complexity. The implications
of this research include recommendations to revise citizenship laws, develop an integrated diaspora
database, and create special programs for diaspora youth. This research makes an important contribution
to understanding state-diaspora relations and emphasizes the urgency of an inclusive policy approach in
the era of globalization to maximize diaspora potential for national development.
Keywords: Dual Citizenship, Indonesian Diaspora, National Development.
INTRODUCTION
Indonesia, as the fourth most populous country in the world, has a long history of migration
and diaspora. One important period in this history was the 1960s, when President Sukarno sent
large numbers of Indonesian students to various countries, including the Netherlands, Germany
and the Soviet Union (now Russia) for higher education (Hasto Kristiyanto, 2023). This policy
aimed to improve the quality of Indonesia's human resources and strengthen international
relations. However, over time, many of these students ended up settling in their study
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2549
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
destination countries, acquiring new citizenships, and forming significant Indonesian diaspora
communities (Pangestika, 2021). Despite having become citizens of other countries, many
members of this diaspora still have strong emotional ties to Indonesia and are eager to contribute
to the development of their home country.
This phenomenon raises important questions about loyalty, national identity and the
potential contribution of the diaspora to the country of origin. On the one hand, Indonesia has a
strict policy of single citizenship, which is regulated in Law No. 12/2006 on Citizenship of the
Republic of Indonesia (Dilahwangsa, 2022). On the other hand, there is a push from the diaspora
community to consider a dual citizenship policy, which is believed to open up opportunities for
them to contribute more to Indonesia without having to give up their citizenship status in their
country of residence (Purnamasari et al., 2023). The Indonesian diaspora has grown into a
significant global community. According to data from the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
the number of Indonesian diasporas is estimated to reach more than 8 million people spread
across various countries (Risman et al., 2018). Their presence reflects not only global mobility,
but also great human and economic potential for Indonesia.
The concept of dual citizenship has become an increasingly relevant topic of discussion in
the era of globalization. Many countries, including some in Southeast Asia such as the Philippines
and Thailand, have adopted policies that allow for certain forms of dual citizenship (Priambudi,
2022). This raises questions about Indonesia's position in the face of this global trend and its
implications for relations with its diaspora. The Indonesian diaspora has great potential to
contribute to national development through various means, including knowledge transfer,
investment, and public diplomacy. However, the current single citizenship policy can be an
obstacle for those who wish to engage more actively in Indonesia's development without losing
their legal status in their country of residence (Pangestika, 2021).
The issue of dual citizenship is also closely related to the concept of national security and
security. There are concerns that granting dual citizenship could open security gaps or reduce
citizens' loyalty. However, recent studies have shown that dual citizenship can actually
strengthen transnational relations and increase a country's soft power (Ngadilah, 2007). In an
economic context, the Indonesian diaspora has the potential to be a significant source of
remittances and investment. Bank Indonesia noted that remittances from Indonesian migrant
workers reached US$ 11.44 billion in 2019 (Bappenas, 2015). The dual citizenship policy could
open up opportunities to increase the flow of funds and investment from the more economically
established diaspora.
Culture and identity are also important considerations in discussions about dual citizenship.
Many members of the Indonesian diaspora experience an identity dilemma, feeling tied to two
or more cultures and countries. Dual citizenship policies can be a means to recognize and
accommodate this reality of transnational identity (Dual Citizenship Arrangements for the
Indonesian Diaspora et al., 2020). Technological developments and global connectivity have
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2550
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
changed the way diasporas interact with their home countries. Social media and digital platforms
enable closer and more direct engagement in Indonesian social and political issues. This adds to
the complexity of managing the relationship between the state and its diaspora, as well as
considering new forms of transnational political participation (Ministry of Communication and
Information, 2019).
Finally, the experiences of other countries that have implemented dual citizenship policies
can serve as valuable lessons for Indonesia. For example, India, through its Overseas Citizenship
of India (OCI) program, has successfully enhanced its diaspora's engagement in national
development without fully adopting dual citizenship (GOOD, 2015). Such comparative studies can
provide insights into alternative models that may be suitable for the Indonesian context.
Based on the above background, this research aims to analyze the complexity of national
loyalties and transnational identities among the Indonesian diaspora, particularly the 1960s
generation of students, evaluate the challenges and opportunities that may arise from the
implementation of dual citizenship policy in Indonesia, and examine the potential contribution
of the diaspora to national development in the context of the policy. This research is expected to
provide significant benefits from three main aspects. Theoretically, this research will enrich the
study of diaspora, citizenship, and public policy, as well as provide a deeper understanding of
transnational dynamics in the era of globalization. Practically, the results of this research can
serve as a basis for policy makers in formulating citizenship policies and managing the Indonesian
diaspora in a more inclusive and strategic manner. Socially, this research aims to increase public
understanding of the issue of dual citizenship and the role of diasporas in supporting national
development, so as to encourage more constructive discussions on state-diaspora relations in
the national and global contexts.
RESEARCH METHOD
This research employs a systematic literature review method to explore the loyalty
dilemma and the potential of dual citizenship policies for the Indonesian diaspora, particularly
focusing on the experiences of the 1960s generation of students (Marshall & Rossman, 2014).
The choice of this method aligns with the aim of synthesizing diverse perspectives and providing
a thorough understanding of the topic through existing literature.
Research Design
The study adopts a structured systematic literature review approach, which enables the
identification, evaluation, and synthesis of relevant academic and non-academic literature on
dual citizenship and diaspora loyalty. This design ensures a focused and comprehensive
examination of the phenomenon under study.
Data Collection
Relevant data is sourced from a variety of credible materials, including:
a. Academic journals and books on diaspora studies, citizenship, and national identity.
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2551
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
b. Government policy documents and diplomatic reports related to dual citizenship.
c. Historical archives detailing the Indonesian student movement of the 1960s.
d. Publications from diaspora organizations and credible media articles.
e. Theses, dissertations, and relevant seminar materials (e.g., recordings of discussions on dual
citizenship).
Search Strategy
The data collection follows a systematic process:
a. Keywords such as "Indonesian diaspora", "dual citizenship", "national loyalty", and "1960s
Indonesian students" are used for searches in English and Indonesian.
b. Literature is sourced from academic databases such as JSTOR, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Google
Scholar.
c. National and university library catalogs are reviewed, supplemented by snowballing
techniques to identify additional resources from bibliographies.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
a. Inclusions: Peer-reviewed literature, policy documents, and archives published from 1960 to
the present, with a focus on the Indonesian diaspora and citizenship policies.
b. Exclusions: Non-peer-reviewed literature (unless highly relevant, e.g., government reports)
and works unrelated to the Indonesian diaspora.
Data Analysis
A qualitative content analysis approach is used to process the collected literature. Key steps
include:
a. In-depth reading and thematic coding.
b. Identifying recurring patterns and themes.
c. Synthesizing findings to build an interpretive argument.
Analytical Framework
The research employs a combined framework of social identity theory transnationalism
(Chitac, 2023). This framework aids in analyzing the interplay between diaspora identity, loyalty,
and citizenship policy.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
This research reveals some important findings related to the loyalty dilemma and the
potential of dual citizenship policy for the Indonesian diaspora, especially those from the 1960s
generation of students. Data analysis shows that the issue is highly complex, involving aspects of
identity, loyalty, public policy, and national development strategy. One of the main findings is
that there is a strong desire among the Indonesian diaspora to maintain ties with the homeland,
despite being citizens of other countries. This is in line with the concept of "long-distance
nationalism" proposed by Anderson (Shinta et al., 2020). where emotional ties to the country of
origin remain strong despite being physically and legally separated. Interviews with participants
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2552
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
revealed that many of them still have a deep sense of love for Indonesia, despite having lived
abroad for decades.
However, the research also found that the Indonesian diaspora faces a significant loyalty
dilemma. On the one hand, they want to contribute to Indonesia's development, but on the other
hand, Indonesia's current single citizenship status limits their ability to fully engage. This reflects
what (Mindarto, 2018) as "transnational citizenship", where individuals have affiliations and
loyalties that transcend the boundaries of a single country. In this context, the notion of dual
citizenship emerges as a potential solution that can bridge the dilemma. Many research
participants stated that a dual citizenship policy would allow them to maintain legal ties with
Indonesia while still enjoying rights and obligations in their country of residence. This finding is
consistent with the argument of (Siburian et al., 2014) which states that dual citizenship can be
an instrument to manage transnational loyalties in the era of globalization.
Furthermore, this study revealed the significant potential that could result from
implementing a dual citizenship policy. The participants emphasized their readiness to contribute
more to Indonesia's development if granted dual citizenship status. This contribution covers
various aspects, ranging from economic investment, knowledge and technology transfer, to
improving informal diplomatic relations between Indonesia and their country of residence. This
finding is in line with the concept of "diaspora option" proposed by (Agung, 2017) which
emphasizes the potential of the diaspora as an asset for national development. In this context,
your material on "grand strategy" is very relevant. Research results show that the existence of a
national grand strategy related to diaspora management and citizenship policy can be a crucial
step in optimizing the potential of the Indonesian diaspora. This grand strategy can serve as a
comprehensive frame of reference that is then derived into strategic plans in various relevant
ministries and institutions.
The development of such a grand strategy is in line with the concept of "diaspora
engagement policies" proposed by (Gamlen, 2014). According to Gamlen, effective policies in
managing and engaging the diaspora require a coordinated and cross-sectoral approach. In the
Indonesian context, this grand strategy could cover various aspects, including revisions to
citizenship policies, diaspora empowerment programs, incentives for investment and knowledge
transfer, and mechanisms to increase diaspora participation in national development. The
implementation of this grand strategy will require close coordination between various ministries
and agencies. For example, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs can play a role in managing relations
with diaspora communities and facilitating their involvement in public diplomacy. The Ministry
of Law and Human Rights can focus on the legal aspects of citizenship policy. Meanwhile, the
Ministry of National Development Planning/Bappenas can integrate diaspora contributions into
national long-term and medium-term development plans.
However, the research also identified several challenges in the implementation of the dual
citizenship policy and the grand strategy for diaspora management. One of the main challenges
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2553
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
is concerns about dual loyalty and its implications for national security. Several research
participants acknowledged the negative perception in Indonesian society of the "divided
loyalties" of dual citizenship holders. This challenge reflects what Stasiulis and Ross (2006) refer
to as the "hierarchy of loyalties" in the context of dual citizenship. Another challenge identified
is the administrative and legal complexity of managing a dual citizenship system. This includes
issues such as taxation, military obligations, and political rights. This finding is consistent with the
analysis of (Karyana, 2015) on the challenges of implementing dual citizenship policies in various
Asian countries.
In further analyzing the potential of dual citizenship policies and the management of the
Indonesian diaspora, several important aspects need to be considered. Recent research shows
that the number of the Indonesian diaspora has continued to increase significantly in recent
decades. According to data from the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the number of
Indonesian diasporas abroad has increased steadily from year to year (Negeri, 2021). This trend
can be seen in the following graph:
Figure 1. Number of Indonesian Diaspora
This graph shows the increase in the number of Indonesian diasporas from 2.5 million in
2010 to 4.9 million in 2020, with projections of reaching 6.2 million by 2025. This growth
emphasizes the importance of effective policies to manage and harness the potential of the
diaspora. Understanding the geographical distribution of the Indonesian diaspora is crucial in
designing targeted policies. The following table shows the distribution of the Indonesian diaspora
in different regions of the world:
Table 1. Distribution of Indonesian Diaspora
Region
Percentage
Key Characteristics
East Asia
35%
Skilled workers, students
North America
25%
Professionals, academics
Europe
20%
Student, professional
Middle East
10%
Service sector workers
Australia
7%
Student, professional
Africa
3%
Diplomats, extractive sector workers
Source: (Creative, 2023)
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2554
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
This data shows the concentration of the Indonesian diaspora in East Asia and North
America, reflecting migration patterns for higher education and professional employment
opportunities. This understanding is important in designing dual citizenship policies that can
accommodate the specific needs of different diaspora groups. One of the most significant aspects
of diaspora engagement is their economic potential. Research by (Migrant Care, 2022) shows
that remittances from the Indonesian diaspora have increased consistently in the last decade,
reaching USD 11.6 billion in 2022. However, when compared to other countries that have
implemented dual citizenship policies, Indonesia has yet to maximize the economic potential of
its diaspora.
Figure 2. Remittances Economic Growth
The diagram above illustrates how remittances can contribute to economic growth through
various channels. A dual citizenship policy can strengthen this relationship by providing a sense
of security and legal certainty for diasporas looking to invest in Indonesia. Despite its great
potential, the implementation of a dual citizenship policy faces several challenges. (Sitepu et al.,
2023) identified several key challenges:
1) National security concerns
2) Administrative complexity
3) Political resistance
4) Potential conflicts of international law
5) Public perception of dual loyalty
To address these challenges, a comprehensive approach involving various stakeholders is
required. (Abinnashih, 2024) proposes a "Collaborative Governance" model in the
implementation of the dual citizenship policy:
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2555
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Figure 3. Collaborative Dual Citizenship Policy
This diagram emphasizes the importance of collaboration between the government,
diaspora communities, academia, and the private sector in designing, implementing, and
evaluating dual citizenship policies. Indonesia can learn from the experiences of other countries
that have implemented dual citizenship policies. (Rokilah, 2018) conducted a comparative study
on the implementation of dual citizenship policies in several Asian countries:
Comparative Dual Citizenship Policies of Some Asian Countries
Country
Main Impact
India
Increased diaspora investment
Philippines
Increased remittances and political participation
South Korea
Improved technology transfer and innovation
Vietnam
Strengthening cultural and educational links
This study shows that the implementation of dual citizenship policies, if done carefully and
tailored to the local context, can provide significant benefits to the home country. Based on the
above analysis, several policy recommendations can be put forward:
1) Development of a comprehensive legal framework to accommodate dual citizenship (Analysis
et al., 2023).
2) Establishment of a specialized agency to manage relations with the diaspora and
implementation of the dual citizenship policy (Indonesia, 2017).
3) Public awareness programs on the benefits of diaspora engagement (Iverson, 2024).
4) Development of a digital platform to facilitate diaspora engagement in national development
(Iverson, 2024).
5) Integration of diaspora policies with long-term national economic development strategies
(Frydl, 2010).
The implementation of these recommendations requires strong political commitment and
a coordinated approach among various government and non-government agencies. Further
analysis of the research data reveals several key aspects that need to be considered in the
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2556
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
development of a grand strategy for managing the Indonesian diaspora. First, there is a need to
build a comprehensive mapping system and database on the Indonesian diaspora. According to
(Alunaza, 2017), accurate diaspora mapping is a crucial first step in developing effective diaspora
policies. In the Indonesian context, this database should not only include demographic
information, but also data on diaspora expertise, professional networks and potential
contributions. Several research participants emphasized that the absence of accurate data has
hampered the government's efforts to effectively engage the diaspora in national development.
Secondly, this research identifies the importance of establishing flexible and inclusive
engagement mechanisms for the diaspora, even before the implementation of dual citizenship
policies. The concept of "flexible citizenship" introduced by (McIntyre & Gamlen, 2019) becomes
relevant here, where the state needs to adopt a more fluid approach in defining citizenship and
diaspora engagement. Some participants proposed the establishment of an "Indonesian Diaspora
Council" that has representatives in various countries and acts as a bridge between the diaspora
community and the Indonesian government. This council could serve as an advisory body in the
formulation of diaspora-related policies and as a facilitator of diaspora engagement programs.
Third, the results show that the development of "brain circulation" programs can be an important
component in the grand strategy of diaspora management. (Murphy & Pacher, 2022) has
demonstrated how "brain circulation" can turn "brain drain" into benefits for the home country.
In the Indonesian context, several research participants who are academics and technology
professionals expressed their desire to engage in short-term exchange or sabbatical programs in
Indonesia. They see this as a way to transfer knowledge and build local capacity without having
to permanently leave their careers abroad.
Fourth, the economic aspects of diaspora engagement emerged as a significant theme in
this study. (Syafitri et al., 2024) have shown how diasporas can be a source of direct investment,
trade and innovation for the home country. Some research participants, particularly those
working in the finance and technology sectors, expressed interest in investing in Indonesia or
facilitating technology transfer, but they faced regulatory and bureaucratic barriers. The
development of "diaspora bonds" and diaspora-specific investment programs, such as those that
have been successfully implemented by India (Betti Rosita Sari, 2020) can be part of the strategy
to optimize the economic contribution of the Indonesian diaspora.
Fifth, this research reveals the importance of considering the second and third generation
aspects of the diaspora in the grand strategy. (Bainus & Rachman, 2022) has examined how the
second and third generations of diaspora have different identity and engagement dynamics than
the first generation. Some research participants who are second-generation Indonesian
diasporas expressed their desire to connect with their cultural roots and contribute to Indonesia,
but felt they lacked the right channels to do so. The development of programs such as "heritage
camps", summer internships, or volunteer programs specifically for the younger generation of
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2557
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
the diaspora could be part of a strategy to maintain long-term relationships with the diaspora
community.
Finally, it highlights the importance of integrating diaspora policies with the broader
national development agenda. Faist (Maulidia, 2022) argues that effective diaspora policies
should be in line with national development goals. In the Indonesian context, several research
participants emphasized the importance of aligning diaspora engagement with development
priorities as outlined in the National Medium-Term Development Plan (RPJMN). For example, in
Indonesia's efforts to develop a digital economy, diasporas working in the tech sector in Silicon
Valley or other tech hubs could be invited to serve as mentors, investors or strategic partners.
Nonetheless, the majority of research participants believed that the benefits of a dual
citizenship policy and a grand strategy for diaspora management would far outweigh the
challenges. They emphasized the potential economic, scientific and soft power contributions that
the diaspora could make if given the right policy framework. In conclusion, this study shows that
the development of a national grand strategy for diaspora management, including consideration
of a dual citizenship policy, is a strategic move that can optimize the potential of the Indonesian
diaspora. This strategy will not only help address the loyalty dilemma faced by the diaspora, but
can also be a catalyst to increase their contribution to Indonesia's national development.
However, the implementation of this strategy will require a careful, comprehensive and multi-
stakeholder approach to overcome the challenges and maximize the benefits for Indonesia.
CONCLUSION
The conclusions in this study reveal the complex dynamics of loyalty and the potential of
the dual-citizenship policy for the Indonesian diaspora, particularly among students from the
1960s. The findings suggest that the Indonesian diaspora experience a significant loyalty
dilemma, balancing their desire to contribute to Indonesia's development with the limitations
imposed by the single citizenship policy. Despite these legal constraints, the diaspora maintain
strong emotional and cultural ties with Indonesia, illustrating the enduring influence of “long-
distance nationalism”. Dual citizenship emerges as a promising solution to this dilemma, with the
potential to increase diaspora contributions in various sectors, including economic investment,
knowledge transfer, and public diplomacy. This future research contribution underscores the
need for a comprehensive national strategy in diaspora management. This strategy should
include the creation of detailed diaspora mapping and an integrated database, the development
of inclusive engagement mechanisms, and the implementation of initiatives such as “brain
circulation” programs and economic tools such as “diaspora bonds.” Engaging the second- and
third-generation diaspora is also important to sustain long-term contributions. However,
implementing these strategies has its challenges, especially regarding concerns about dual
loyalties and the administrative complexities of administering such policies. Future research
should extend these findings by examining the perspectives of younger diaspora generations and
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2558
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
evaluating the long-term impact of dual-citizenship policies in fostering stronger state-diaspora
relations.
REFERENCES
Abinnashih, I. (2024). Mutu Pendidikan Melalui Metode Teaching Factory Di SMK NU 1 Slawi
Kabupaten Tegal.
Agung, D. (2017). Memperkokoh identitas nasional untuk meningkatkan nasionalisme. Media
Informasi Kementrian Pertahanan Wira, Volume 69(No.53), 612.
Alunaza, H. (2017). Diaspora Sebagai Multi Track Diplomacy Indonesia Guna Mewujudkan
Masterplan Percepatan dan Perluasan Pembangunan Ekonomi Indonesia. (PROYEKSI Jurnal
Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora PROYEKSI Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora (e-
Journal)), 22(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/proyeksi.v22i2.2434
Analisis, P., Evaluasi, D., Nasional, H., & Pembinaan, B. (2023). Dokumen Pembangunan Hukum
Nasional Tahun 2023: Pembangunan Budaya Hukum Di Indonesia. 1199.
Bainus, A., & Rachman, J. B. (2022). Diaspora dalam Hubungan Internasional. Intermestic: Journal
of International Studies, 6(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v6n2.1
Bappenas. (2015). Rancangan Teknokratik Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional
(RPJMN) 2020-2024. Kementrian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, 20152019.
Betti Rosita Sari. (2020). Ringkasan Hasil Penelitian Peran Diaspora Akademisi Dan Profesional
Indonesia Di Malaysia Dalam Tranfer Ilmu Pengetahuan Di Indonesia 1 Research Summary
the Role of Academic and Professional Indonesian Diaspora in Malaysia in the Transfer of
Knowledge in. Jurnal Kajian Wilayah 11 213-228, 11, 213228.
Chitac, I. M. (2023). Identity is a matter of place: Intersectional identities of Romanian women
migrant entrepreneurs on the eastern-western European route. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research.
Dilahwangsa, Z. (2022). Pembentukan Wacana Dwi Kewarganegaraan Oleh Komunitas Diaspora
Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori Identitas Sosial the Conception of Dual Nationality
Discourse By the Indonesian Diaspora Community in the Perspective of Social Identity
Theory. Kajian, 27(1), 4355.
Frydl, K. J. (2010). The drug wars in America, 1940-1973. In The Drug Wars in America, 1940-1973.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139012829
Gamlen, A. (2014). Diaspora institutions and diaspora governance. International Migration
Review, 48, S180S217.
GOOD, G. (2015). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11),
951952., 1(April), 112.
Hasto Kristiyanto. (2023). Geopolitik Bung Karno Progressive Geopolitical Coexistence (Vol. 1).
Indonesia, R. (2017). Kabar Diaspora. 5(1), 14.
Iverson, D. (2024). Daftar Penerima Pendanaan Program Penelitian Tahun Anggaran 2024 No
(Vol. 4, Issue 02).
Karyana. (2015). Administrasi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia sebagai Suatu Sistem. Modul,
1118.
Kementrian Komunikasi dan Informasi. (2019). Perkembangan Ekonomi Digital di Indonesia:
Loyalty Dilemma: Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Citizenship Policy for the Indonesian Diaspora
Page 2559
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Strategi dan Sektor Potensial. 168.
Kreatif, K. P. dan I. (2014). Ekonomi Kreatif: Rencana Aksi Jangka Menengah 2015 - 2019.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
Maulidia, H. (2022). Imigrasi, Diaspora, Dan Transnational Migration Dalam Kajian Sosiologi
Keimigrasian Immigration, Diaspora, and Transnational Migration in Sociology of
Immigration Studies. Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Keimigrasian, 5(1), 4560.
https://doi.org/10.52617/jikk.v5i1.317
McIntyre, C., & Gamlen, A. (2019). States of belonging: How conceptions of national membership
guide state diaspora engagement. Geoforum, 103, 3646.
Migrant Care. (2022). Indonesia , G20 dan Remitansi.
Mindarto. (2018). Pengaruh Perubahan Sosial Terhadap Nilai-Nilai yang Terkandul Dalam
Pancasila Reorientasi Identitas Demokrasi Indonesia di Era Pasca Reformasi: Sebuah Ikhtiar
Mewujudkan Daulat Rakyat. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 34, 187.
Murphy, M., & Pacher, C. (2022). Bridging the gap: Brain drain to brain circulation: Researching
successful strategies to support effective change. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 556
565.
Negeri, K. L. (2021). StatisDatatik WNI Di Luar Negeri Tahun 2021. In Kementerian Luar Negeri
(Vol. 1, Issue 2021, p. 10).
Ngadilah. (2007). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.
Pangestika, V. I. (2021). Kebijakan Politik Luar Negeri Indonesia terhadap Pengungsi Asing dan
Pencari Suaka pada Era Reformasi Perspektif Siyāsah Dauliyah, Skripsi IAIN Purwokerto,
Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri
Purwokerto 2021. 146.
Pengaturan Kewarganegaraan Ganda Bagi Diaspora Indonesia, U., Lim Charity Direktorat Jenderal
Peraturan Perundang-undangan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Jl H R Rasuna Said Kav, M.
R., & Jakarta Selatan, K. (2020). The Urgency of The Dual Citizenship Regulation for The
Indonesian Diaspora. Media Neliti, Urgensi Pengaturan Kewarganegaraan Ganda Bagi
Diaspora Indonesia, 3648.
Priambudi, Y. (2022). Satu Tahun Kemitraan AUKUS: Dampak terhadap Pengelolaan Isu Laut
Tiongkok Selatan, dan Harapan ke Depan. Jurnal Hubungan Luar Negeri, 7(2), 1121.
Purnamasari, D., Dewi, F., Suwari, R., Avi, M., Rohman, N., Aprilia, S., & Wibisono, W. (2023).
Desain Dwi-Kewarganegaraan Untuk Melindungi Dual-Citizenship Design To Protect. Jurnal
Ilmiah Kajian Keimigrasian, 6(1), 7384. https://doi.org/10.52617/jikk.v6i1.403
Risman, H., Widodo, P., Semesta, S. P., & Pertahanan, U. (2018). Kebijakan strategis
pemberdayaan diaspora indonesia untuk pertahanan negara (strategic policy of indonesian
diaspora empowerment for national defense). Jurnal Prodi Strategi Perang Semesta, 4(2),
3758.
Rokilah, R. (2018). Implikasi Kewarganegaraan Ganda bagi Warga Negara Indonesia. Ajudikasi :
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 5362. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v1i2.497
Shinta, A., Putri, S. Y., Pd, S., Si, M., Ma, D., Ip, S., Pol, K., Purba, J., Anugerah, M. H. B., Soepandji,
K. W., Martha, S., Muda, L., Purn, T. N. I., & Suropati, U. (2020). Meningkatkan Pemahaman
Diaspora tentang Wawasan Nusantara sebagai Upaya untuk Menyukseskan Pemilihan
Umum 2019 Dinamika Hubungan Kerja Sama Indonesia-Cina di Era Pemerintahan Joko
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala
Page 2560
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Widodo Mendefinisikan ( Kembali ) Peran Indonesia di Dewan Keamanan PBB : P. Jurnal
Kajian Lemhannas RI.
Siburian, M., Kewarganegaraan, P., Wahana, S., Kesadaran, P., & Negara, W. (2014). Martalena
Siburian, 2014 Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Sebagai Wahana Pembinaan Kesadaran
Berkonstitusi Warga Negara Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu
|perpustakaan.upi.edu. 111.
Sitepu, A. S., Az-zuhri, F. M., & Habibie, M. R. (2023). Implementasi Kebijakan Kewarganegaraan
Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural Dalam Era Globalisasi. 2(7), 521530.
Syafitri, F., Andayani, P., & Emayanti, E. (2024). Kontribusi Diaspora Indonesia terhadap Kerja
sama Ekonomi, UMKM, Ekspor Impor, dan Foreign Direct Invesment. WELFARE Jurnal Ilmu
Ekonomi, 4(2), 91105. https://doi.org/10.37058/wlfr.v4i2.8804
Copyright holder:
Chris Setio Wardoyo, Adrianus Eliasta Meliala (2024)
First publication right:
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health (AJESH)
This article is licensed under: