Vika Fransisca
Page 2561
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024 - (2561-2570)
p-ISSN 2980-4868 | e-ISSN 2980-4841
https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp
Indonesia's Active Role in ASEAN in Responding to the Rohingya
Human Rights Crisis
Putri Mushfiya1*, Stanislaus Riyanta2
Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Emails: putrimushfiya26@gmail.com1, stanislaus@ui.ac.id2
ABSTRACT
The human rights crisis experienced by the Rohingya in Myanmar has become one of the biggest
humanitarian issues in Southeast Asia. As an ASEAN member country with significant influence in the
region, Indonesia plays an important role in efforts to resolve this crisis. This research aims to analyze the
role of Indonesia's diplomacy in encouraging ASEAN to take firmer steps against Myanmar and in providing
humanitarian assistance to victims of the crisis. The research method used is a qualitative approach with
secondary data analysis, including policy documents, international reports, and related academic studies.
The results showed that Indonesia, through a multilateral diplomacy approach, actively encouraged
ASEAN to find a peaceful solution, despite being constrained by ASEAN's non-intervention principle and
the diverse interests of member states. In addition, Indonesia also showed commitment in providing
humanitarian assistance through bilateral and multilateral initiatives. The implications of this research
emphasize the importance of Indonesia's diplomatic role not only at the ASEAN level but also in
international forums. With the increasing number of Rohingya refugees seeking refuge in neighboring
countries, including Indonesia, this research recommends strengthening regional and international
collaboration to create a more sustainable solution in resolving the Rohingya crisis as a whole.
Keywords: Indonesia, ASEAN, Rohingya, Human Rights, Diplomacy.
INTRODUCTION
Indonesia has a vital role in ASEAN in dealing with the human rights crisis experienced by
the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar (Salsabila & Ridwan, 2023). As one of the ASEAN member
states with a solid commitment to humanitarian values, Indonesia has taken diplomatic steps to
help address this crisis. The approach used by Indonesia is diplomacy based on dialog and
multilateral cooperation, hoping to find a comprehensive solution to the problem. Although
ASEAN has a principle of non-intervention, Indonesia is still trying to mobilize support from
member countries to encourage Myanmar to resolve this crisis peacefully (Rahmawati &
Zakiyuddin, 2022).
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta
Page 2562
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
The Rohingya refugee crisis in Indonesia has drawn international attention. In recent years,
the wave of Rohingya refugees entering Indonesian territory, especially in Aceh Province, has
become a complex problem (Listriani & Kadir, 2020). The conflict in Myanmar has forced
thousands of Rohingya to seek refuge in neighboring countries, including Indonesia. This poses a
national security and resilience challenge, which requires an in-depth evaluation to identify
possible risks (Missbach, 2021).
In carrying out this role, Indonesia faces various challenges that take work. One of the
biggest challenges is ASEAN's limitation in responding to domestic issues experienced by its
member states, including Myanmar. The principle of non-intervention upheld by ASEAN is often
a barrier to further action in pressuring Myanmar to stop human rights violations against the
Rohingya. Moreover, the divergent political interests among ASEAN member states make
collective efforts to address this crisis more difficult. Indonesia must work hard to build consensus
and ensure that all member states are committed to a peaceful and humane resolution (Setiawan
& Suryanti, 2021).
The conflict in Myanmar has forced thousands of Rohingya to seek refuge in neighboring
countries, including Indonesia. This poses a national security and resilience challenge, requiring
an in-depth evaluation to identify possible risks. On the other hand, Indonesia also faces pressure
from the international community demanding more decisive action against Myanmar. As a
country considered to have a leadership position in ASEAN, Indonesia is expected to take more
initiative in addressing the Rohingya crisis. However, this is only sometimes easy, given the
existing diplomatic and political limitations. In this context, Indonesia must carefully balance its
role in ASEAN and respond to international pressure while maintaining good relations with all
parties involved (Sopamena, 2023).
The issue of human rights violations against the Rohingya has become one of the biggest
humanitarian crises in Southeast Asia over the past few decades. The Rohingya, who are
predominantly Muslim, have been subjected to systematic persecution in Myanmar, leading to a
mass exodus to neighboring countries, including Bangladesh, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Amid this
crisis, Indonesia, as a country with significant influence in ASEAN, has a vital role in addressing
this issue (Ambarwati, 2022).
Indonesia, as the country with the world's largest Muslim population and an active member
of ASEAN, has demonstrated a strong commitment to upholding human rights and supporting
peaceful conflict resolution. In addition, Indonesia has extensive experience in addressing
humanitarian issues both at the regional and international levels, making it an important actor in
various regional dynamics. As one of the countries with significant influence in ASEAN,
Indonesia's role in resolving the Rohingya crisis is not only relevant in the regional context but
also important in broader international relations (Ar Rasyid & Rijal, 2023).
However, Indonesia's role in ASEAN in addressing the Rohingya crisis is not free from
challenges. One of the main challenges is the principle of non-intervention upheld by ASEAN. This
Indonesia's Active Role in ASEAN in Responding to the Rohingya Human Rights Crisis
Page 2563
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
principle often becomes an obstacle to more assertive collective action against member states
involved in human rights violations. In addition, domestic political dynamics in Myanmar and the
inability of the international community to exert sufficient pressure on the Myanmar government
have also complicated efforts to resolve this crisis (Azizah, 2017).
Through this research, the focus will be on Indonesia's efforts in dealing with these
challenges, particularly through multilateral diplomacy and humanitarian aid approaches. Based
on the above background, this research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Indonesia's
diplomatic role in resolving the Rohingya crisis, and identify strategic steps that can strengthen
Indonesia's contribution in the future. By analyzing the existing challenges and opportunities, this
research is expected to benefit new contributions to the understanding of the role of ASEAN
member states in addressing human rights issues in the region. The prediction of this research is
that closer collaboration between Indonesia, ASEAN, and the international community can result
in more effective measures to resolve the crisis in a sustainable manner.
RESEARCH METHOD
The research method used in this research is a literature review, which aims to analyze and
summarize findings from various previous studies related to Indonesia's role in addressing the
human rights crisis involving the Rohingya ethnic group within the ASEAN framework. This
approach involves several systematic procedures to ensure the comprehensiveness and validity
of the data:
Data Collection Procedures
The data collection process includes identifying and gathering relevant scholarly sources,
such as peer-reviewed journal articles, official reports from international organizations (e.g.,
UNHCR, ASEAN Secretariat), government publications, and credible news outlets. Keywords such
as "Indonesia's diplomacy," "Rohingya crisis," "ASEAN human rights," and "non-intervention
principle" were used to conduct a comprehensive search across academic databases and
institutional repositories.
Evaluation and Selection of Sources
After collecting initial data, each source was evaluated for relevance, credibility, and
reliability. Peer-reviewed journals and official documents were prioritized to ensure the accuracy
and authority of the information. Criteria such as publication date, alignment with the research
topic, and the reputation of the authors or organizations were applied during the evaluation
stage.
Synthesis of Information
The selected sources were carefully analyzed to extract key findings related to Indonesia’s
role in addressing the Rohingya crisis, challenges encountered, and proposed solutions. The data
were then synthesized to identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the literature, which serve as the
foundation for the research's analysis and conclusions.
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta
Page 2564
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Data Validation Stages
To validate the data and ensure the integrity of the findings, the following strategies were
implemented:
a. Triangulation: Cross-referencing findings from multiple sources to identify consistent patterns
and verify their accuracy.
b. Critical Appraisal: Conducting a critical review of each source to assess its methodological rigor
and eliminate potential biases.
c. Expert Consultation: Consulting with experts in international relations and ASEAN studies to
confirm interpretations of the data and enhance the validity of the conclusions.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Indonesia plays a central role in ASEAN, especially in addressing human rights issues. As the
country with the largest population in Southeast Asia and one of the founders of ASEAN,
Indonesia is responsible for maintaining stability, security, and peace in the region. Since the
reform era, Indonesia has increasingly promoted democracy and human rights at the national
and regional levels. Within ASEAN itself, Indonesia has often been a prime mover in human rights
discussions despite the organization's vital principle of non-intervention. While there are limits
on the extent to which ASEAN can get involved in the internal affairs of its member states,
Indonesia still seeks to encourage better dialogue and cooperation among member states on
critical human rights issues.
Indonesia's commitment to human rights is seen in its efforts to support the establishment
of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) in 2009 (Fauzan, 2020).
Although AICHR does not have the power to intervene directly in cases of human rights violations,
Indonesia continues to encourage the strengthening of the commission's role. As a country with
a growing democratic experience, Indonesia is often a spokesperson in encouraging ASEAN to
take human rights issues in the region more seriously. However, the limited authority of AICHR
and the principle of non-intervention remain significant obstacles. However, Indonesia has been
instrumental in creating a space for deeper dialogue on the importance of human rights
protection at the regional level.
One crucial case that shows Indonesia's role in handling human rights issues in ASEAN is
the Rohingya crisis in Myanmar (Hartanto, 2024). Indonesia plays an active role in diplomacy,
trying to mediate between Myanmar and the international community in finding solutions to the
human rights violations faced by the Rohingya. This crisis has caused tens of thousands of
Rohingya to flee to other countries, especially Bangladesh. Although limited by the principle of
non-intervention, Indonesia has continued to provide humanitarian assistance and urged
Myanmar to stop the violence against the Rohingya. Indonesia also brought the issue to
international forums, including the United Nations (UN), for a more comprehensive solution.
These steps demonstrate Indonesia's commitment to addressing the human rights crisis in the
Indonesia's Active Role in ASEAN in Responding to the Rohingya Human Rights Crisis
Page 2565
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
region, although the results achieved have not been entirely adequate to overcome the problem.
(Pradityo, 2020).
The challenges faced by Indonesia in addressing human rights issues in ASEAN are complex.
One of the biggest challenges is ASEAN's inability to intervene in the internal affairs of member
states due to the principle of non-intervention. This often makes it difficult to pressure countries
involved in human rights violations, such as Myanmar. On the other hand, ASEAN member states
have diverse views on human rights, especially countries that still adhere to authoritarian or
semi-authoritarian regimes. Although Indonesia has consistently promoted the protection of
human rights, these divergent views often hinder the achievement of consensus in resolving
human rights issues in the ASEAN region. In addition, internal political dynamics in some member
states also affect ASEAN's response to human rights violations, so Indonesia has to deal with
various political and diplomatic obstacles (Matthew, 2020).
Despite many challenges, Indonesia continues to play a strategic role in strengthening
human rights enforcement efforts in ASEAN. In the future, Indonesia has the potential to
encourage ASEAN further to be more responsive in addressing human rights issues, especially
with the increasing public awareness in ASEAN countries about the importance of protecting
human rights. Through more muscular diplomacy and collaboration with various parties,
including international organizations and human rights institutions, Indonesia can continue to be
a leader in fighting for human rights in the Southeast Asian region. Thus, Indonesia's efforts are
essential to ensure regional stability and build a more inclusive and equitable ASEAN for all its
citizens (Natasha et al., 2021).
Recently, the case of Rohingya refugees fleeing to Indonesia has again attracted
international attention, highlighting the dire conditions experienced by this ethnic group in their
home countries and even in refugee camps. In late 2023, hundreds of Rohingya refugees arrived
in Indonesian waters after a long and dangerous journey across the Indian Ocean. This case adds
to the long list of Rohingya refugees seeking refuge in Indonesia, a country geographically located
on the escape route for those caught in the precarious situation in Myanmar and Bangladesh.
This phenomenon underscores how desperate the problem faced by the Rohingya is that they
are willing to travel dangerously in search of safety (Santri et al., 2019).
Rohingya refugees fleeing to Indonesia are usually on unseaworthy boats, often stranded
at sea for days without adequate food and water. The boats are frequently operated by human
smuggling syndicates who exploit their plight, forcing them to pay enormous fees for a risky
journey. Many suffer starvation, dehydration, and even death at sea before reaching the shores
of countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, or Thailand. The arrival of Rohingya refugees in Aceh
and other coastal areas of Indonesia signifies the gravity of their situation. Also, it reiterates the
need for further action from ASEAN countries and the international community to resolve this
crisis.
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta
Page 2566
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
This is not the first case of Rohingya refugees fleeing to Indonesia. Over the past few years,
Indonesia has become one of the leading destinations for Rohingya refugees fleeing violence in
Myanmar and poor conditions in refugee camps in Bangladesh. In 2020, a large influx of Rohingya
refugees also washed ashore in Aceh, drawing public attention to the hardships they faced.
Although Indonesia is not a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, the country has
nonetheless shown humanitarian concern by providing temporary shelter for these refugees.
Local communities in Aceh, in particular, have shown tremendous solidarity by helping to provide
food and humanitarian aid to the refugees who landed in their area (Sopamena, 2023).
However, the case of Rohingya refugees fleeing to Indonesia also shows the limitations of
international protection efforts. Rohingya refugees often face precarious situations after arriving
in countries like Indonesia. Although they receive temporary protection, their status as refugees
is not officially recognized by the Indonesian government, as the Refugee Convention does not
legally bind Indonesia (Yani & Zulkarnain, 2019). This creates challenges regarding security,
access to human rights, and their future. Most Rohingya refugees in Indonesia end up stuck in a
stagnant situation in refugee camps for years with no certainty as to whether they can be
relocated to a third country or return to Myanmar safely.
This case also reflects the failure of the international community, including ASEAN, to
resolve the Rohingya crisis as a whole. Indonesia has played an active role in promoting dialogue
on resolving the Rohingya crisis at the ASEAN level. Still, the organization's limitations in dealing
with the internal affairs of member states such as Myanmar have slowed the process. ASEAN's
principle of non-intervention has often prevented more decisive action against the Myanmar
government. Nonetheless, Indonesia continues to engage in bilateral and multilateral diplomacy,
including through ASEAN, to urge Myanmar to immediately end human rights violations against
the Rohingya and create conditions for their safe return.
With the latest arrival of Rohingya refugees in Indonesia, it is becoming increasingly clear
that the crisis has yet to find an adequate solution. As long as there is no significant change in
Myanmar, either in terms of politics or the treatment of the Rohingya, the flow of refugees
fleeing oppression and violence is likely to continue. This case also demands a more significant
response from the international community, including ASEAN countries, to provide a long-term
solution for the refugees. Indonesia, as a country that is often the final destination for Rohingya
refugees, needs to continue to push for diplomatic and humanitarian efforts to resolve this crisis
while strengthening cooperation with international institutions such as the United Nations in
addressing the impact of this refugee crisis.
Several previous studies have highlighted the role of Indonesian diplomacy in international
and regional forums, including ASEAN. These studies show that Indonesia has a strong track
record in promoting dialogue and peaceful conflict resolution, especially in the context of intra-
state conflicts in Southeast Asia (Ain & Wulandari, 2023).. However, some studies show that
internal political dynamics and limited diplomatic capacity often constrain Indonesia's role in
Indonesia's Active Role in ASEAN in Responding to the Rohingya Human Rights Crisis
Page 2567
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
addressing human rights issues in ASEAN. In addition, ASEAN's principle of non-intervention is
usually an obstacle for Indonesia to take more decisive action against member states that violate
human rights (Della, 2017).
Based on research results from (Triono 2014), it is known that the conflict and violence
experienced by ethnic Rohingya in Myanmar is still not well resolved, even though ASEAN has
tried to play a role in determining the conflict. Triono highlighted that the principle of non-
intervention embraced by ASEAN is one of the main obstacles in collective efforts to deal with
internal issues of its member states, including the humanitarian crisis that befell the Rohingya
ethnicity. Triono also noted that the proactive efforts made by ASEAN, especially by Indonesia,
have not shown significant results in ending the suffering of the Rohingya.
Other research conducted by (Ajawaila et al., 2022) reinforces these findings by
emphasizing Indonesia's role in applying the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) concept to address
the humanitarian crisis in Myanmar. According to them, Indonesia understands the complexity
of the conflict involving the Rohingya ethnicity and continues to encourage the Myanmar
Government to resolve the issue peacefully. The research highlights that despite Indonesia's
efforts to advocate for the implementation of R2P, success in pressuring Myanmar to protect the
Rohingya still needs to be improved due to internal political dynamics in Myanmar as well as the
lack of collective solid support from ASEAN.
Research from other sources, such as in a journal published by Universitas Kristen Indonesia
Maluku, also emphasizes the importance of Indonesia's role in encouraging peaceful solutions
through a preventive diplomacy approach. Indonesia is considered to have a strategic position in
ASEAN. It has tried to overcome the obstacles arising from the principle of non-intervention by
initiating dialogue and providing humanitarian assistance to the Rohingya. Nonetheless, as this
research reveals, the main challenge Indonesia faces is ASEAN's inability to collectively pressure
Myanmar and the lack of a more assertive intervention to protect human rights in the region.
The findings from the literature review offer significant implications for the development
of theory and practice in international relations, particularly regarding Indonesia's foreign policy
and ASEAN's role in addressing human rights crises. The analysis highlights Indonesia's adherence
to its "free and active" foreign policy principles, which position the country as a mediator and
advocate for peaceful conflict resolution within ASEAN. This theoretical framework reinforces
Indonesia's diplomatic identity as a bridge-builder in regional disputes. However, the practical
challenges posed by ASEAN's non-intervention principle reveal a critical gap between policy
ideals and implementation. These findings suggest that while Indonesia's diplomatic efforts are
commendable, a more flexible and adaptive approach to ASEAN's principles may be required to
address complex humanitarian crises like the Rohingya issue effectively. Additionally, the
research underscores the need for Indonesia to leverage its influence by fostering stronger
collaborations with international organizations and other ASEAN members to navigate the
limitations of the non-intervention principle. This dual focus on theoretical insights and practical
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta
Page 2568
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
strategies provides a foundation for both policymakers and scholars to refine ASEAN's collective
approach to human rights issues while enhancing Indonesia's role as a proactive regional leader
(Natasha et al., 2021).
The findings from the literature review suggest the potential for developing new models or
practices to enhance Indonesia’s role in addressing human rights crises within the ASEAN
framework and at the global level. At the UN, Indonesia has consistently demonstrated its
commitment to upholding human rights and supporting global initiatives to protect vulnerable
groups, including the Rohingya. This active engagement highlights Indonesia’s capability to bridge
regional and international efforts, providing a basis for proposing a more structured and
innovative model of "multilateral humanitarian diplomacy." This model could formalize
Indonesia's approach by integrating its domestic experiences with human rights advocacy and its
regional influence in ASEAN to address crises like the Rohingya issue.
Furthermore, Indonesia’s actions, such as supporting UN resolutions condemning violence
against the Rohingya and pressuring the Myanmar government to halt repressive actions (Triono,
2014), illustrate its potential to lead an ASEAN-centered coalition within the UN. This coalition
could advocate for a regional accountability framework that aligns with ASEAN's principles while
addressing human rights violations more effectively. The proposed model emphasizes a dual
approach: (1) leveraging Indonesia’s diplomatic clout to enhance collective regional responses
and (2) utilizing multilateral platforms like the UN to apply international pressure on non-
compliant states. These strategies, rooted in Indonesia’s demonstrated commitment and
proactive stance, provide a blueprint for strengthening ASEAN’s and Indonesia's roles in
addressing complex humanitarian challenges.
CONCLUSION
Indonesia plays a vital role in ASEAN in addressing the human rights crisis against the
Rohingya. Through active diplomacy and multilateral dialog, Indonesia continues to push for a
peaceful solution despite the challenges posed by ASEAN's principle of non-intervention. This
commitment is evident in Indonesia's consistent involvement in humanitarian efforts, such as
providing aid to displaced Rohingya populations and advocating for constructive dialogue within
ASEAN. These actions demonstrate Indonesia's efforts to uphold human rights and its aspiration
to strengthen its leadership role in the Southeast Asian region. However, the research highlights
significant challenges faced by Indonesia, including the complex domestic political dynamics
within Myanmar, the lack of consensus among ASEAN member states, and the limitations
imposed by the non-intervention principle. These factors often hinder Indonesia's ability to
enforce more effective measures. Despite these barriers, Indonesia has continued to advocate
for international support and collaboration, emphasizing the importance of multilateralism in
addressing this crisis.
Indonesia's Active Role in ASEAN in Responding to the Rohingya Human Rights Crisis
Page 2569
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
For future researchers, this research underscores the need to explore Indonesia's approach
to balancing ASEAN principles with its human rights agenda. Researchers could also investigate
the role of external actors, such as the United Nations or international NGOs, in complementing
ASEAN's efforts. Additionally, comparative studies on how other ASEAN countries address similar
crises could provide valuable insights into best practices and areas for improvement. Future work
might also consider the long-term impacts of Indonesia's initiatives on regional stability and
human rights protections in Southeast Asia.
REFERENCES
Ain, W. N., & Wulandari, S. D. M. (2023). Keketuaan ASEAN dan Potensi Diplomasi Indonesia
dalam Penyelesaian Konflik di Myanmar. Jurnal Sentris, 4(2), 4661.
Ajawaila, D. P., Matulapelwa, A. H., & Ngongare, S. (2022). Peranan Indonesia Dalam Kasus Etnis
Rohingya Berdasarkan Konsep Responsibility to Protect (R2P). JURNAL SAINS SOSIAL DAN
HUMANIORA (JSSH), 2(1), 131136.
Ambarwati, A. (2022). Sikap Asean Terhadap Pelanggaran Ham Di Myanmar Pasca Kudeta. Jurnal
Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 6(1), 2036. https://doi.org/10.38043/jids.v6i1.3360
Ar Rasyid, A. M., & Rijal, N. K. (2023). Peran Asean Dalam Menangani Krisis Kemanusiaan
Myanmar Melalui Kesepakatan Asean Five Point Consensus. Indonesian Journal of
International Relations, 7(1), 2249. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v7i1.423
Azizah, I. N. (2017). Peranan Indonesia Dalam Membantu Penanganan Masalah Etnis Rohingya Di
Myanmar (2014-2017). Global Political Studies Journal, 1(2), 162180.
https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v1i2.2022
Della Paula Ajawaila 1 Alynne Hermyn Matulapelwa 1, dan S. N. (2017). Peranan Indonesia
Dalam Kasus Etnis Rohingya Berdasarkan Konsep Responsibility to Protect (R2P). New
Perspectives on Human Security, 389(10081), 204219.
Fauzan, A. F. (2020). Peran Asian Dalam Menangani Krisis Pengungsi Etnis Rohingnya Periode
2012-2017. Fisip UIN Jakarta.
Hartanto, D. R. (2024). Implikasi dan Dampak Berlabuhnya Pengungsi Rohingya di Daratan
Indonesia terhadap Keamanan Maritim: Studi Kasus dan Analisis Potensial Ancaman.
Saintara: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Maritim, 8(2), 1929.
Listriani, S., & Kadir, M. Y. A. (2020). Toward a New Legal Framework for Settling Rohingya’s
Refugee Crisis in Indonesia: A Lesson Learned from Aceh Province. International Conference
on Law, Governance and Islamic Society (ICOLGIS 2019), 277285.
Matthew, G. (2020). National interests and Indonesian-style diplomacy in resolving the Rohingya
ethnic conflict in Myanmar. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional □ Tahun XIII, 1, 3952.
Missbach, A. (2021). Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Regarding the Forced Displacement of Rohingya
Refugees. Asia-Pacific Journal On Human Rights And The Law, 22, 6995.
Natasha, C., Fauzan, D., Rhea, G., Tresna Putri, P. M., Lulu, I., & Yasmeen, E. (2021). Diplomasi
Konferensi Indonesia Terkait Konflik Etnis Rohingnya di Myanmar. Jurnal Sentris, 173187.
Pradityo, R. (2020). Indonesia di Antara Masalah Etnis Rohingya dan Etnis Uighur, 2014-2019.
Indonesian Perspective, 5(2), 138158. https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v5i2.33958
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta
Page 2570
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health
Volume 3, No. 11 November 2024
Rahmawati, R., & Zakiyuddin, A. (2022). Peran Asean Intergovernmental Commission on Human
Rights Dalam Penanganan Islamophobia Dalam Kasus Rohingya. Neo Politea, 3(2), 1938.
https://doi.org/10.53675/neopolitea.v3i2.1055
Salsabila, N., & Ridwan, W. (2023). Peran International Organization for Mitigation (IOM) dalam
Menangani Krisis Kemanusiaan Etnis Rohingya di Indonesia. Independen: Jurnal Politik
Indonesia Dan Global, 4(1), 4049.
Santri, Abdullah, M. Z., & Muh. Syahartijan, L. O. (2019). Peran Asean Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik
Rohingya (Studi Kasus Pada Konflik Tahun 2012-2017). Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 5(9), 132.
Setiawan, I. P., & Suryanti, M. S. D. (2021). Keterlibatan Asean dalam Menangani Konflik
Myanmar (Studi Kasus: Konflik Etnis Rohingya 2017 2019). POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik Dan
Pemerintahan, 1(2), 8397. https://doi.org/10.22225/politicos.1.2.2021.83-97
Sopamena, C. A. (2023). Pengungsi Rohingya Dan Potensi Konflik & Kemajemukan Horizontal Di
Aceh. Jurnal Caraka Prabu, 7(2), 85115. https://doi.org/10.36859/jcp.v7i2.1927
Triono. (2014). Peran ASEAN Dalam Konflik Etnis Rohingnya. Jurnal TAPIs, 10(2), 111.
Yani, Y. M., & Zulkarnain, Z. (2019). Dimensi Penanganan Dalam Kasus Pengungsi Internasional:
Teori Dan Praktik. Populis: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 114.
Copyright holder:
Putri Mushfiya, Stanislaus Riyanta (2024)
First publication right:
Asian Journal of Engineering, Social, and Health (AJESH)
This article is licensed under: