Vika Fransisca

Volume 3, No. 12 December 2024 - (2759-2767)

p-ISSN 2980-4868 | e-ISSN 2980-4841

https://ajesh.ph/index.php/gp


Employee Performance, Knowledge Management, and Work Environment on Job Stress at PT. Mentari Terbit Engineering,

Bandung City

 

Erika Nurmartiani1*, Muhamad Ryanto2

Universitas Sangga Buana, Indonesia

Emails: erika.nur@usbypkp.ac.id1, m.ryanto@usbypkp.ac.id2

 

 

Page 1

Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health

 

Volume 3, No. 12 December 2024


 

ABSTRACT


Work stress is a condition of tension that affects the physical and mental balance of employees, which in turn can reduce performance and productivity in the workplace. PT Mentari Terbit Engineering (MTE) faces challenges in maintaining optimal employee performance amidst the dynamics of a competitive work environment. For this reason, good human resource management, including the application of knowledge management and the creation of a comfortable work environment, is crucial in reducing work stress levels and improving employee performance. This study aims to analyze the effect of employee performance, knowledge management, and work environment on work stress at PT Mentari Terbit Engineering, Bandung City. Using quantitative methods, data were obtained through questionnaires on 50 employees selected by simple random. The data were then analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method using LISREL software. The results showed that work environment and work stress had a significant influence on employee performance, while knowledge management showed no significant influence. This study implies the importance of creating a conducive work environment to increase productivity and reduce stress levels in the work environment.                                                       


Employee Performance, Knowledge Management, and Work Environment on Job Stress at PT. Mentari Terbit Engineering, Bandung City

 

Keywords: Employee Performance, Knowledge Management, Work Environment, Work Stress.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The survival of a company is determined by the success of the organization in managing existing human resources (Mahapatro, 2021). Human resources play a very important role in realizing the company's vision, mission and goals that have been set, and can determine the real achievement of the company with the available resources (Putri & Rahyuda, 2019). Hasibuan in (Sinurat Elperida Juniami, 2019) defines human resources as a science and art that regulates the relationship and role of labor so that it effectively and efficiently helps realize the goals of the company, employees and society. Human resources are very vital company assets, therefore their role and function cannot be replaced by other resources including modern technology (Riniwati, 2016). Good human resources will be able to carry out company activities more optimally and minimize losses (Siagian, 2023).

PT Mentari Terbit Engineering (MTE) is a company engaged in the work of planning consultants, assessment and supervision of structural construction projects for buildings, bridges and docks. The number of MTE employees is 50 people.

Work stress is a condition of tension that causes physical and mental imbalance and has an impact on a person's emotions and conditions (Daniel, 2019). The company will experience losses if there are employees who experience work stress because it will have an impact on reducing performance. The company through the knowledge and talent management department has an important role as an asset to organize employees in increasing employee knowledge and i deas and reducing work pressure in anticipation of burnout at work (Kossyva et al., 2024).

Good performance can result in high work productivity. Employee performance is the result of work in quality and quantity that can be achieved by an employee in carrying out his duties in accordance with the responsibilities given to him (Sofuan & Setyowati, 2014). HR performance can be seen from the quality and quantity of the results of the work done, as well as the timeliness of job completion (Al-Musadieq et al., 2018). Poor performance will have an impact on the company's image and certainly slow down the process of achieving organizational goals. Negligence, lack of thoroughness and lack of responsibility in tasks are examples of poor employee performance. Therefore, improving employee performance is a serious concern in all fields of industry, both in large and small companies.

Employee performance will achieve maximum results if supported by their knowledge. The 21st century is known as the era of knowledge and information. Nonaka and Takeuchi (Widyatmika et al., 2019) stated that in order for knowledge in an organization to be transformed from the individual dimension to the collective dimension or from the tacit form to the explicit form, the organization can provide opportunities for people to interact with each other directly.

MTE in facing challenges to win the competitive business environment needs to have qualified employees. Through the application of Knowledge management that allows employees to share knowledge and information. The application of Knowledge management is one way that can be used to maintain employee work results.

Knowledge management is an effort for the company to manage knowledge into company assets (Omotayo, 2015). Knowledge management can increase employee knowledge easily and improve employee abilities quickly by obtaining information and training. Good work environment conditions are one of the factors supporting employee productivity which ultimately has an impact on increasing employee performance levels (Surijadi & Musa, 2020). The workplace environment is an important component of work life for employees because employees spend most of their time at work, and it affects them in one way or another (Hafeez et al., 2019). In the work environment, companies must be able to review how to make employees feel comfortable with the work environment provided by the company that allows employees to work optimally.

The novelty of this study lies in its focus on integrating knowledge management, work environment, and work stress as interrelated factors influencing employee performance, specifically in the context of PT Mentari Terbit Engineering (MTE). Unlike previous studies that often examine these factors independently, this research explores how they collectively affect employee productivity and mental well-being in a mid-sized company specializing in structural construction consulting services. This study also emphasizes the role of knowledge-sharing mechanisms in mitigating work stress and enhancing employee performance, offering a unique perspective on managing human capital effectively.

Based on the background description above, the purpose of this study is to determine and analyze employee performance, knowledge management, work environment on work stress at PT Mentari Terbit Engineering Bandung City. This study provides practical and theoretical contributions. Practically, the findings will guide PT Mentari Terbit Engineering in designing strategies to create a supportive work environment, implement effective knowledge management systems, and reduce work stress, ultimately improving employee performance. Theoretically, this research contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive framework that connects work environment, knowledge management, and stress management to employee productivity. It offers a foundation for future studies to explore these dynamics in other industries and organizational contexts.

 

RESEARCH METHOD

This study employed a quantitative research method and was conducted in 2024. The unit of analysis consisted of employees of PT Mentari Terbit Engineering, located in Bandung City. The data collection process involved obtaining primary data through questionnaires distributed to respondents. The questionnaire utilized a 5-point Likert scale to measure variables, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" (1) to "Strongly Agree" (5). The sample size for the study was 50 respondents, selected using a simple random sampling technique to ensure that every employee had an equal chance of being included in the sample. This approach enhances the representativeness of the data. The collected data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), a robust statistical technique for examining relationships between variables. The analysis was conducted using LISREL software version 8.7, which is widely recognized for its ability to perform complex modeling and hypothesis testing effectively.


RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Model Evaluation

Outer model evaluation

The outer model (measurement model) is measured by first order measurement with valid items where the loading factor is >0.50 and the calculated t value is > 2.09 (t table at =0.05/2).  Table 1 below displays the results of the outer model measurement.

Table 1 shows the validity and reliability measurements using Cronbach Alpha and CR composite reliability. The Loading Factor to assess Convergent validity and its significance (Prob and t-value) were evaluated, where the loading factor exceeded 0.50 and the calculated t-value of all indicators was greater than 2.09 with prob. <0.05.

The measurements used for internal consistency are Cronbach alpha and composite reliability (CR), which measure reliability based on the observed variable relationship of items. The reliability value is acceptable if Composite Reliability (CR) and Cronbach alpha > 0.70 (Sürücü & Maslakci, 2020). A high composite reliability is an excellent indication that the items measure the same construct. Overall, the measures used in this study have adequate reliability and validity.

Table 1. Validity and Reliability (Outer Model)

Variable

Indicator

Loading Factor

Standard Deviation

t count

Prob.

Cronbach's Alpha

Construct Reliability (CR)

Employee Performance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

KK1 <- Employee Performance

0.830

0.039

21.349

0.000

0.942

0.951

KK2 <- Employee Performance

0.783

0.076

10.358

0.000

 

 

KK3 <- Employee Performance

0.920

0.025

36.329

0.000

 

 

KK4 <- Employee Performance

0.797

0.047

16.841

0.000

 

 

KK5 <- Employee Performance

0.839

0.034

24.658

0.000

 

 

KK6 <- Employee Performance

0.876

0.029

30.118

0.000

 

 

KK7 <- Employee Performance

0.801

0.082

9.815

0.000

 

 

KK8 <- Employee Performance

0.828

0.039

21.011

0.000

 

 

KK9 <- Employee Performance

0.763

0.079

9.611

0.000

 

 

Knowledge Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

KM1 <- Knowledge Management

0.832

0.082

10.208

0.000

0.945

0.955

KM2 <- Knowledge Management

0.873

0.059

14.730

0.000

 

 

KM3 <- Knowledge Management

0.904

0.038

23.895

0.000

 

 

KM4 <- Knowledge Management

0.910

0.013

71.080

0.000

 

 

KM5 <- Knowledge Management

0.847

0.089

9.504

0.000

 

 

KM6 <- Knowledge Management

0.864

0.059

14.680

0.000

 

 

KM7 <- Knowledge Management

0.836

0.067

12.438

0.000

 

 

Environment

Work

 

 

 

 

LK1 <- Work Environment

0.946

0.021

45.801

0.000

0.941

0.956

LK2 <- Work Environment

0.912

0.047

19.281

0.000

 

 

LK3 <- Work Environment

0.939

0.019

48.746

0.000

 

 

LK4 <- Work Environment

0.848

0.050

17.076

0.000

 

 

LK5 <- Work Environment

0.854

0.058

14.747

0.000

 

 

Work Stress

 

 

 

 

Stress1 <- Work Stress

0.841

0.032

26.583

0.000

0.879

0.910

Stress2 <- Job Stress

0.856

0.040

21.499

0.000

 

 

Stress3 <- Job Stress

0.745

0.123

6.072

0.000

 

 

Stress4 <- Job Stress

0.834

0.046

18.011

0.000

 

 

Stress5 <- Job Stress

0.814

0.057

14.312

0.000

 

 

Source: SmartPLSv3.0 output (2024)

Evaluation of Inner Model

The structural model referred to as the inner model shows the relationship (path) between constructs. Inner model evaluation is done using R-square, predictive relevance (Q-square value), and Goodness of Fit (GoF). According to (Nitzl & Chin, 2017), the R-Square value is 0.67 strong, 0.33 medium, and 0.19 weak. GoF is used to validate measurement and structural models with values of 0-0.25 small, 0.25-0.36 medium, and >0.36 large. Prediction Relevance (Q-Square) is a test to determine the predictive ability with the blindfolding procedure. Q-Square values are 0.35 (large), 0.15 (medium), and 0.02 (small).

Table 2. Evaluation of Inner Mode (R-Square, f Square, Q Square and GOF)

 

R Square

f Square

Q Square

GOF

Employee Performance

0,842

-

0,568

0,692

Knowledge Management

-

0.125

-

Work Environment

-

0.259

-

Work Stress

-

0.179

-

Source: SmartPLSv3.0 output (2024)

Table 2 explains the magnitude of the influence of independent variables (exogenous) on endogenous with a strong R-square (above 0.67), GoF is in the large category (> 0.36) and Q-Square is in the large category (above 0.35), so the model is fit. The results of data processing with SmartPLS are presented in the path diagram as follows:

Figure 1. Path Diagram of Testing Results

Hypothesis Testing Results

Table 3. Hypothesis Testing Results

No.

Hypothesis

Path Coefficient

Std. Error

t-value

Prob.

R2

Conclusion

1

Knowledge Management -> Employee Performance

0,330

0,171

1,930

0,054

0,109

Not Significant

2

Work Environment -> Employee Performance

0,475

0,180

2,645

0,008

0,226

Significant

3

Job Stress -> Employee Performance

0,204

0,062

3,319

0,001

0,042

Significant

Source: Data processed with SmartPls v3,

Based on the results in table 3, it is known that work environment and stress have a significant effect on employee performance where the t-count value> t table at =0.05/2 (2.09) and Prob < 0.05, so the hypothesis is accepted. While knowledge management does not have a significant effect on employee performance where the t-count value = 1.930 < t table at =0.05/2 (2.09) and has prob 0.054> 0.05. The work environment has a dominant influence with a coefficient of 0.475 and R2 = 0.226.

The results of this study highlight the significant role of work environment and work stress in influencing employee performance, with work environment showing the strongest impact. This finding is in line with previous research, such as (Sundariati, 2024), which emphasizes that a supportive and well-maintained work environment can foster employee motivation and productivity. In addition, the significant effect of job stress on employee performance corroborates the research of (Napitu & Tarigan, 2022)), which emphasizes the detrimental impact of unmanaged stress on work outcomes. Interestingly, the absence of a significant relationship between knowledge management and performance challenges the findings of (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 2019), which suggests that the mere presence of a knowledge sharing system may not be enough to improve performance without deeper integration into daily work processes. The results of this study suggest that companies such as PT Mentari Terbit Engineering should focus on creating a supportive work environment and implementing an effective stress management program while re-evaluating their knowledge management practices to ensure that they match the needs and goals of the organization.

 

CONCLUSION

This study found that work environment and stress level have a significant effect on employee performance at PT Mentari Terbit Engineering, while knowledge management showed no significant effect. These results suggest that companies need to focus more on creating a comfortable work environment as well as effective stress management strategies to improve employee productivity. Support from a good work environment can reduce stress and directly contribute to improved performance.

For future research, this contribution opens up opportunities to further examine the relationship between knowledge management and employee performance by considering additional factors such as leadership style and intrinsic motivation. Future research is also recommended to explore the implementation of more specific stress management programs and evaluate their impact on employee outcomes across different industry sectors.

 

REFERENCES

Al-Musadieq, M., Raharjo, K., Solimun, S., & Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, A. (2018). The mediating effect of work motivation on the influence of job design and organizational culture against HR performance. Journal of Management Development, 37(6), 452–469.

Daniel, C. O. (2019). Effects of job stress on employee’s performance. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Research, 6(2), 375–382.

Hafeez, I., Yingjun, Z., Hafeez, S., Mansoor, R., & Rehman, K. U. (2019). Impact of workplace environment on employee performance: mediating role of employee health. Business, Management and Economics Engineering, 17(2), 173–193.

Kossyva, D., Theriou, G., Aggelidis, V., & Sarigiannidis, L. (2024). Retaining talent in knowledge-intensive services: enhancing employee engagement through human resource, knowledge and change management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(2), 409–439.

Mahapatro, B. (2021). Human resource management. New Age International (P) ltd.

Napitu, R., & Tarigan, W. J. (2022). Dampak Konflik dan Stress Kerja terhadap Kinerja pada PTPN IV Dolok Sinumbah. J-MAS (Jurnal Manajemen Dan Sains), 7(1), 290–298.

Nitzl, C., & Chin, W. W. (2017). The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research. Journal of Management Control, 28, 137–156.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (2019). The wise company: How companies create continuous innovation. Oxford University Press.

Omotayo, F. O. (2015). Knowledge Management as an important tool in Organisational Management: A Review of Literature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1(2015), 1–23.

Putri, N. M. S. R., & Rahyuda, A. G. (2019). Peran stres kerja dalam memediasi pengaruh beban kerja dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan. Udayana University.

Riniwati, H. (2016). Manajemen sumberdaya manusia: Aktivitas utama dan pengembangan SDM. Universitas Brawijaya Press.

Siagian, S. (2023). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Yayasan Drestanta Pelita Indonesia.

Sinurat Elperida Juniami, M. D. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pt. Perkebunan Nusantara III Medan. Jurnal Ilmiah Skylandsea, 3(2).

Sofuan, M., & Setyowati, W. (2014). Pengaruh Kompensasi Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dengan Mediasi Kepuasan Kerja (Studi Pada Unit Pelayanan Pendapatan dan Pemberdayaan Aset Daerah Koordinator PATI). Jurnal Ilmiah Telaah Manajemen, 11(2).

Sundariati, N. N. A. (2024). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Lingkungan Kerja dan Motivasi Terhadap Semangat Kerja Karyawan Pada PT. Gapura Angkasa Badung. Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar.

Surijadi, H., & Musa, M. N. D. (2020). Dampak Beban Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai. Public Policy, 1(2), 101–114.

Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.

Widyatmika, M. A., Putra, T., & Indriani, M. N. (2019). Knowledge Management dalam Organisasi. Widya Teknik, 13(02), 1–15.

 

Copyright holder:

Erika Nurmartiani, Muhamad Ryanto (2025)

 

First publication right:

Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health (AJESH)

 

This article is licensed under:

 

 

 

Page 1

Asian Journal of Engineering, Social and Health

 

Volume 3, No. 12 December 2025