Correlation Between Reid–Eustachian Tube Angle, Length, and Diameter Based on Temporal Bone CT Scan with Severity Level in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v4i11.694Keywords:
Chronic suppurative otitis media, Reid–Eustachian tube angle, MERI Score, CT scan of temporal bone, optimal threshold valueAbstract
Chronic suppurative otitis media (OMSK) is an inflammatory condition of the middle ear characterized by perforation of the tympanic membrane and persistent otore, with a global prevalence of 65–330 million people, mainly in developing countries such as Indonesia (2.7% in rural areas, 0.7% in urban areas). The Reid–Eustachian tube angle, length, and diameter of the tubes play an important role in the pathogenesis of OMSK as it affects ventilation and drainage of the middle ear. This study explored the correlation of anatomical parameters of the Eustachian tube with the severity of OMSK based on the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI) Score using CT scan of the temporal bone. Determine the Correlation of Reid–Eustachian Tube angle, length, and diameter of the Eustachian tube based on CT scan with OMSK severity based on MERI Score, and determine optimal threshold values (cut-off) for predicting moderate to severe OMSK severity. Cross-sectional analytical observational research was conducted on 60 OMSK patients at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital, Denpasar, for the period January 2019–December 2024. Reid–tuba angle, length, and diameter data were measured via 128/256-slice CT scan with multiplanar reconstruction. The severity of OMSK was assessed using the MERI Score. Spearman correlation analysis, ordinal logistic regression, and ROC curve were used to evaluate relationships and determine cut-offs. The Reid–Tuba angle showed a significant negative correlation with the MERI score (r = –0.342; p = 0.007). Narrower angles (5–13°) increased the risk of OMSK by 7.823 times more than wider angles (p = 0.011; 95% CI: 1.587–38.542). The ROC curve analysis set a cut-off point of 17.8° to distinguish mild from medium–heavy OMSK, and 15.2° to distinguish moderate OMSK (15.2°–<17.8°) from heavy OMSK (<15.2°). Eustachian tube length (r = –0.040; p = 0.763) and Eustachian tube diameter (r = –0.001; p = 0.994) showed no significant association with OMSK severity. A cut-off of 17.8° provides 100% sensitivity, 96.2% specificity, and a Youden Index of 0.962, with an AUC of 0.991 confirming the classification accuracy is excellent. The Reid–Tuba angle was negatively correlated with the MERI's score, where the narrower angle was associated with a higher severity of OMSK. The analysis showed that the Reid–Tuba angle was able to distinguish light, medium, and heavy OMSK with excellent accuracy, while the length and diameter of the Eustachian tube had no significant effect. These findings confirm the potential of the Reid–Tuba angle as an important anatomical indicator in the early detection and stratification of OMSK severity.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Edward Jemi Terisno, Pande Putu Yuli Anandasari, Ni Nyoman Margiani, I Made Dwijaputra Ayusta, Elysanti Dwi Martadiani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.



