Professionalism of Investigators When Determining the Status Of Suspected Victims Who Died in Traffic Accidents

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the legal certainty of the investigation and investigation process that is in harmony with both material and formal regulations in the context of traffic accidents. This paper provides awareness of the importance of legal harmony in paradigms, norms, understandings, and redactions or word terms in order to produce legal certainty and legal renewal in the content of laws and regulations. The research method uses juridical normative research methods with primary and secondary sources through descriptive analytical literature studies with statutory approaches and conceptual approaches since and data analysis techniques using descriptive analytical. The results of the study concluded that the importance of compatibility and harmony of paradigms, norms, understanding, redaction or word terms in each appropriate regulation, so that it must be clearly interpreted and accompanied by additional updates regarding the legal position in handling traffic accidents or other relevant events. The addition of the norm is, for example, there is no evidence, there is not enough evidence, or he is a victim, then he must use the legal position as "Whistleblower/reporter, Victim (if victim), or Deceased Person (If deceased)."